JEB BUSH LAW FIRM EVENT / HD
JEB BUSH SPEAKS AT LAW FIRM EVENT AND Q&A
13:40:14
Thank you Jason. Thank you Jason very much, I am gonna take you on the road. I got about 7 more events in New Hampshire, can you introduce me every place that-- that's about as good as it gets. I don't have to say it for the record, you heard it, I am proud of having served as Governor of the State of Florida. And I think past is prolonged, I think it's important actually know what people can do and one way to do it is to look into the past and get a sense of what makes them tick, how they bring people together, how they stick to things that are important, all those things, and I am proud of the record of Florida, purple state, the largest swing state where we applied conservative principles and income rose for people. It didn't rise that much for government and good things happened.
13:40:59
So thank you for reminding me of one of the greatest jobs I ever had. I am not aspiring to be President of the United States and in this particular job I think as we get closer, particularly in places like New Hampshire which my experience is that you all are pretty discerning voters, you get to, I mean law firms get to see, you know, 5 presidential candidates, and probably you'll see all of them by the time February comes around. It's a pretty extraordinary position.
13:41:25
And as you get closer to the election my belief, my guess is that you are wanna know who is gonna sit behind the big desk. Not necessarily who is fueling my frustrations. 90% of Americans are angry and upset for good reason. But at some point we are gonna transfer that to who can make the tough decisions so my frustrations can subside. Who can keep us safer and freer and stronger than the day that the end of his time than the day that he started. And if that's the principle (?) that people make this decision, then I feel pretty good about my chances. Three months ago at the Reagan Library, and if you haven't been there I would urge you to go, I have 3 favorite libraries, there is one in (?) station, one in Dallas and the one in Simi Valley which is extraordinary. I didn't go to visit, I went to give a speech. Three months ago.
13:42:18
Prior to the tragedy of Paris. Prior to the tragedy in San Bernardino. And the tragedies in between. Where I laid out a strategy to destroy ISIS, not to contain it. There is a report today that suggest once again, that containment is a policy of failure, abject failure. Containment means a caliphate the size of Indiana exists in our midsts, with 30,000 battle tested terrorists gaining strength each and every day that they exist in that form.
13:42:53
Recruiting terrorists, homegrown terrorists and terrorists, they doubled the number of people coming to the caliphate, according to this report, an intelligence report that was made public. This is not a policy that's going to keep us safe. In fact, it's doing the exact opposite. So I laid out a strategy. And some of the details that matter are to arm directly the Kurds. The president does not want to do that for whatever reason. Our strongest allies in Iraq need to have direct support.
13:43:18
It requires I think embedding our military inside the Iraqi forces to help them, to train them, to give them a backbone if you will for them to do their part and to make sure that the Iranian influence which we've exacerbated by pulling out of Iraq and signing a deal with Iran doesn't dominate the central government's thinking. It requires re engaging with the Sunni Arab partners who were part of the successful partnership that created the surge that left Iraq secure, fragile so, but secure. We need to re engage the ? because ultimately you're gonna have to replace ISIS with a Sunni led government.
13:43:55
And that requires full cooperation of the Sunni populations ? in the large cities that they control. It requires us taking the lawyers off the backs of the war fighters. We have always upheld the rules, the international standards of war fighting, but in this administration, they have directives from the White House that basically ties the arms behind the backs of our war fighters. Every ? has to be approved by a lawyer in the pentagon. And that result, until recently, is that 75% of all the ? that went out don't drop their ordinances. They go back to the base without doing anything. If this is a war, and I believe it is because they've declared war on us, we need to declare war on them, which means our military needs to do what they do best.
13:44:45
Fiercely, strategically, take out the enemy. And as it relates to Syria, I laid out a plan as well, made much more complicated by our red line, grandiose language of course. But we laid out a policy to create a no fly zone in Syria. I know there's probably people thinking here, some of my friends in the press always bring this up in the gaggle. They say what about Russia? Aren't you worried about Russia? My personal opinion is that Russia ought to be more worried about us than us being worried about Russia.
13:45:16
We're the greatest fighting force in the world. And while we've gutted our military and need to reverse that, no one comes close to the United States if we're serious, if we have the proper leadership. I'm not bellicose in this language, but creating a no fly zone is essentially, is an essential element of a strategy to bring security to Syria. We also need safe zones in Syria. The idea that 4 million Syrians uprooted from their homes is good for the world. 4 million refugees? It's a disaster. It's a humanitarian disaster, and it's a national security disaster for Europe and for our own country.
13:45:58
Better to create the safe zones there than to have massive numbers of refugees head their way to Europe, ultimately creating national security challenges for ourselves. It requires mobilizing a Sunni led force inside of Syria, trained. There are 40,000 so-called moderate Syrian fighters, based on the last report that I saw, all scattered. All in different groups, all in different parts of the country. All of the United States should create a certainty by its leadership that we can coalesce behind one group with the Arab support that is essential for this to happen.
13:46:33
To take out ISIS and bring about regime change in Syria. This is not easy work. But for us too though. Who but the United States can lead? And that's the challenge for our country to date. Are we gonna be part of the community of nations--one more vote in the United Nations? Are we gonna maintain our posture as truly the leader of the free world? Not to be the world's policemen, but to create peace and security. I honestly that this president no longer believes that the United States' leadership is a force for good in the world, and I think he's wrong. Restoring that has to be the first priority of the next president of the United States.
13:47:10
Our friends need to know that we have their back. And our enemies need to fear us a little bit. That requires us to be building a military, strengthening our intelligence capabilities, pausing as it relates to changing the Patriot Act requirements. The metadata program is an essential element, a tool in a toolkit. Not by itself, but a tool in a toolkit to keep us safe. Our civil liberties are not being violated by the metadata program. We need to have confidence again that our country is focused on protecting us. I believe I have the skills to do it, and I'm the only candidate that laid out a plan rather than reacting to the events as they unfold.
13:47:50
Secondly, we need to restore the belief that our children will have more opportunities than what we had. Today, a great majority of Americans think that that's not the case. And that requires shifting power away away from Washington D.C. back to American families, empowering people to make more choices for themselves, focusing on fixing how we tax, fixing how we regulate. We've created the most complicated regulatory system in the developed world. In fact, the World Bank measures the ease in which businesses can start up. We're 49th in the world. Russia and Afghanistan are ahead of us based on those indices for crying out loud.
13:48:30
This is serious business. And I think we need a president that makes a commitment to restore our ability to compete in the world, rising income for the middle class and lift people out of poverty. And I have detailed plans to do just that. The final thing that I want to tell you is that I believe life is a gift from God, that is divinely inspired. I believe it. It's not a political statement. It is informed by my faith and my life experience. I believe it from the end of my toes to the top of my head.
13:48:58
It's just, it's how I organize my life. the joy I have to pursue this chance to be president of the United States, and if you believe like I do, that life is a gift from God, than the focus ought to be not manage people's liabilities but to make sure that they have the capacity to achieve their god-given abilities. I have so many examples of participating in that kind of process, where people who were held back had a chance to pursue their dreams as they see fit. And I'll conclude with a story.
13:49:30
In fact, it was a Denesha? weather. It was a friend, now, I met her last year. She came to campaign with me a couple of trips ago to New Hampshire and got a taste of the Granite State, and he was amazed. A lot of Floridians haven't been up here, and it's a beautiful place--the leaves changing. She fell in love with the place, so who knows? She may get this gift from God. She, when she was growing up, lived on the other side of the tracks. A term that I reject out of hand, quite frankly, I think that it shouldn't matter where you're born, what zip code you lived in when you were born. It's a matter of your effort, your work, your creativity. The pursuit is really what matters, and all of us pursuing our dreams in unique ways creates more opportunities than any government program. So Denesha was held back in third grade and was held back again. Two years in a row.
13:50:17
Can you imagine how angry that young child felt and her godmother found out about the Florida tax credit program, it's the largest voucher program in the country. 80,000 low and moderate income kids go to private schools because I took on some really powerful interests, the teachers union, the school board administration, the bureaucrats, politicians that didn't wanna change, oh my God the world was gonna be turned upside down if we empowered low income families to be able to have choices that people of affluence can have. That was the argument made at the time. And we created the first, the second and the third statewide voucher program. And Florida also had the largest voucher program for 4 years old. 144,000 kids go to private schools because I won my political fights.
13:51:03
It wasn't just about me, it was about changing the direction of the State. And so Denesha godmother found out about this program and she got to go to a Christian school. And guess what happened? She overcame those 2 years and she graduated from high school with her age group. And I know what happened that first week, a teacher dedicated to loving her kids, putting her arm around that child and said "I love you, you are capable. God has given you this ability." It's up to us together to make sure that you achieve your maximum abilities. And she did overcome the two years she was held back. And she is the first in her family to graduate from high school and college and this year Denisha Merriweather (?)is gonna graduate with a Master from the University of South Florida. A conservative will never win if we are angry, if we are grievance candidates. If our philosophy is about how bad things are.
13:52:03
But a conservative will always win in a time of fear if we embrace the fact that life truly is a gift from God. We are all assets, no one is a liability. And it's not for us to tell people which line to get into, which government program you have to comply with, that life is so unfair you can't achieve it on your own. It's up to us to make sure that people can achieve their own success in their own terms in their own way. And that's why I am running for President of the United States. I am running because of Denisha Merriweather and literally millions and millions of people that don't want to be told what line to get into. They want a chance to raise up on their own terms.
15:52:40
And I humbly ask for your support. Thank you very much.
[APPLAUSE]
13:52:55
Yes, absolutely, Jason thank you for hosting us as well. I appreciate the, I am a big fan of the chamber. There is a microphone there but you could probably just let it rip.
13:53:05
Q: Governor I am a democrat but I like you.
JB: Why would you say but?
[LAUGHTER]
I like you too and I am a Republican.
Q: Some of your opponents were with the Iran deal say I want to rip this off on day one. You hatched (?) and I am wondering given that only in John Kerry's mind to you negotiate with people you don't trust. Have you changed your position?
13:53:35
JB: I think we need to confront the ambitions of Iran, the main way to do that is to confront their ambitions in the region . They are the largest sponsor of terrorism in the world and nothing in this agreement has stopped that, infact I would say the exact opposite is the case. Literally within a week of the agreement being signed, Sulimani, who Donald Trump couldn't remember the name of, who is the head of the (Kuts?) forces went to Moscow and it may be coincidental but literally within a couple of weeks after that you saw the Russians effectively take control over a military base in Syria and now you have the (Kuts?) forces directly in Syria as well so they have been energized by their efforts to destabilize the region and nothing in this agreement has changed that except that we've relived them if the sanctions related to the nuclear weapons program so they have more money.
13:54:31
And so I would confront those ambitions directly, and I would do so by restoring sanctions based on those efforts, there is ample reason to be able to provide sanctions and we should tell Germany for example or the companies that are anxious in Iran or do business to begin with in Iran, look, I mean Siemens for example is a great business they hire, they must have 5, 6 thousand people working in Florida alone, love the business and it creates high wage jobs in the state where I was the governor of.
13:55:03
But they should have to make a choice. Pick Iran, where the rule of law doesn't apply, where you have a partner more likely to be the Iranian National Guard because they control most of the economy. Or pick a country that respects the rule of law, where you have, you know, the largest business outside of Germany. That's the kind of leadership we need. We need to engage in the region because the net result of what we've done here is that we've created the possibility of nuclear proliferation. If you're the Saudis or the Emirates or the Qataris, and you see what's going on in Iran, you seem the United States effectively changing teams on you, you're gonna change teams as well. You're gonna say we have the resources to build this capability as well.
13:55:47
And maybe we need to realign ourselves. And that will create utter chaos. And so, I do think that we should be engaged to confront Iran, for sure. Across the board. We should confront Iran because of human rights issues. I'm not one to believe that human rights is the exclusive reason to have a foreign policy, but it's a key element. And right now, there are still four Americans held hostage in Iran. It makes no sense for us to be signing an agreement with them, which i totally opposed and then, not getting, not enforce efforts to open up their country. Dictators and mullahs do not go quietly in the night.
13:56:27
In fact, what I've told people is that the first thing I would do as President of the United States is to move our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and close our embassy in Havana, to send a signal that our friends are our friends and that our enemies or those that aren't our friends, have to earn that relationship. That's what we need to do.
13:56:49
Q: Have you thought about who might be picking for a vice-president?
13:57:02
JB: Wow, that would be a little presumptuous of me. [LAUGHTER] I think about how I am gonna win the nomination, that's for sure. And I am focused on that. We have a lot of talented people that could serve as Vice Presidential running mate and more importantly Vice President. The only qualification that truly matters is could that person be president? For whatever unforeseen event, which if I was President I wouldn't want have happen but you gotta plan for that. [LAUGHTER] Everything else is secondary. Because Americans kind of sort this out in their own way. sometimes it's fair, sometimes it didn't. But that is one of the elements of their declining about who they are gonna support for president. The first decision that person makes is their choice for running mate. And so it would have to be that first, and he or she would be a very fine president, we would make sure the vetting process was thorough in that regard. All the rest of this staff, ideological balance, geography balance, all that stuff, not as important. Yes sir.
13:58:16
Q (little boy): Do you have any things you want to have accomplished by the end of your first term? Top 3?
[LAUGHTER]
13:58:39
JB: I'd say a much more secure world which requires us to rebuild our military and re engage both diplomatically and from a national security point of view, restore our counterintelligence and intelligence capabilities so by the first year we should be on a path where our friends know that we have their backs and our enemies realize America is back in the game. We could do that in less than a year but certainly that would be a meaningful goal. Secondly by the end of the first year I would hope that a big bipartisan agreement happened, because our Democracy doesn't work by jamming everything down the other teams throat. We've had Obamacare, the stimulus, Dodd-frank without a single republican vote, none of them are working to the extent that they would had their been a regular order process.
13:59:29
It was bad legislation and it was politically motivated and we need to start getting back to regular order work whether it's entitlements, it could be social security, there has to be a way to forge consensus on a big thing so the American people have confidence that our democracy is working that Washington isn't so out of touch and so corrupt that people just ride it off. And the third thing is we need to be moving towards a balanced budget, we have to, safety and security has to be the first priority in the world we are in but we can't , we're going to have we're going to leave your generation and your parents generation a mess that we will not be able to get out of unless we start moving towards a path towards a balanced budget and that requires high growth, that requires reforming Washington, that requires shift in power away from Washington to the state's, I don't think medicaid ought to be administered in Washington, the department of transportation program should be bottom up from the state's, education policy.
14:00:31
All of this shifting the power and the cost of administration of this stuff back to the state's and then the entitlement programs are really where all the big drivers of cost are. Now what's your name? Cameron what grade are you in? 5th grade, you're pretty smart looks like to me.
14:00:55
Q: About leadership and getting people to work together. Do you have specific examples what you would like to, how you could help to republicans and democrats work together, so that we can accomplish things for the common good.
14:01:09
JB:This is not look, there are people anxious to do this in Washington and congress, but you need a President. Look, our, Barack Obama is a gifted talented person, there is no question he is intelligent, he is a great speaker, but all of his skills seems to me are used to push people down who don't agree with him to make himself look better. And you keep doing that over and over again and the gap is not just ideological, it's also there is no trust, there is none at all. I would start with the premise of people who disagree with me are bad people, like the comment you made unjust, I know you were joking, but I don't think democrats are my enemy.
14:01:48
Hillary Clinton in a moment of real insight in the debate was asked who her enemies were. Cause that's the best measurement of who your friends are, something like that in the debate. And after the diatribe that left, the NRA of course, and the drug companies, whatever, then she paused and she kind of said, well really Republicans are my enemy. Wow. Just assume that these were half and ours are half of the population. You start out as president of the United States assuming that half the people in the country are your enemies? I just don't, that only is gonna make things worse. If you start with the premise that you have deeply held beliefs but that the people that don't agree with you, they don't have bad motives, they just might be wrong. Maybe we should have a conversation to persuade them, maybe there is a way to do it. If there is trust you can find consensus. That's how our democracy had worked. It's not a parliamentary system. That's the challenge, is how do we restore that, you first start, you begin the process by literally engaging with people that don't agree with you.
14:02:52
I tell the story, and this is got politic faceted and said it wasn't true, but all I can tell you is this person told me the story. It was a story told to me by a (?) state senator, in the 5th year after the president had its reelection he had a peace offensive with republicans briefly, you may remember it, it was , they had dinner out with about 12 senators and then he invited this senator to have dinner with him in the residence, and they are going up the rickety elevator to the second floor in the eager aid says "Senator you are the first Republican that President Obama has had dinner with in the residence, 5th year. Well think about that for a moment, you're in business and you'
re trying to make a sale and you get to use the White House just for one night, you go into the, there's all these historic pictures, you're out, you have a nice meal, history all around you.
14:03:46
You're out in the Truman balcony and you have a glass of wine or whatever, you're looking at the washington monument. You don't think you can invent someone to be able to force consensus I mean, the power of the presidency used to be able to forge consensus rather than to push people away and to push people down is an extraordinary tool, and it has been used in almost every presidency and this president has not used it, and I think that's the first step of how to go about this.
Q: I'm a democrat and immigration attorney, I like a lot of what you have to say, I actually might be to the right of you on immigration-
14:04:26
JB: Why is that?
Q: Because I wonder if you support full on amnesty, because Obama and Clinton are terrible on immigration, their ideas are dangerous. And on the other side of the extreme is Donald Trump whose hate and fearmongering would just desecrate the all system. My idea is take citizenship off the table for undocumented immigrants, because we cannot have.
JB: you are not to the right of me.
14:04:49
Q: Ok. So you oppose full on amnesty?
JB: Full on amnesty, I don't even know what that means, so I tell you what I am for.
Q: path to citizenship for people in 5 years.
JB: Right, no. I am not for that. I tell you what I am for. Rather than use the language that means different things to different people. and I wrote a book about it, it's called Immigration Wars and if you give your card I can give you a book rather than you paying buck 99. [LAUGHTER] Or if you give your email address I send it to you as a Christmas present for on Kindle.
Q: I sent you mine.
Q: Give you some ideas.
14:05:22
JB: This is something I know something about because I did a lot of research, I am from Miami, my wife is from Mexico, she is an American citizen. Kind of embedded in the immigrant community, I am proud of it, it's part of our unique heritage. Here is what I believe, apart from all the other things that are necessary like controlling the border, dealing with the Visa overstay, these are serious problems that we have been so lax on, we have to fix. But on your specific question. I think the people oughta come out from the shadows, pay a fine, pay taxes, learn english, don't receive federal government assistance, no crimes being committed and over an extended period of time, and I think in the book we were talking 10 years, you earn legal status.
14:06:07
Q: would you take citizenship, I believe we have to take citizenship off the table [...]
JB: Yes earn legal status
Q; There has to be a penalty for-
JB: Earn legal status, not a path to citizenship, not cutting in line. And I think that's the common ground where we are today and it's not amnesty, people in my party, there are a handful of people that say anything, doing anything is amnesty, well that's not amnesty, 10 years to earn legal status. That's not amnesty.
14:06:39
Amnesty is the 1986 law that Ronald Reagan signed the Simpson Mazzoli law that allowed 2-3 years on a path to citizenship without any kind of effort along the way. There was no earned anything, fill out the form, wait two years and you get a green card and then you can apply for citizenship. The other thing I think we need to do is to take our legal system and reform it so it becomes a strategic part of our high growth. Because today 90% or 85% of all legal immigration comes by family petitioning. And family is defined in the broadest sense in the world. Spouse and minor children like every country in the world has. Adults siblings and adult parents. I am not, I am telling the rest of the crowd, you already know it. And that is called chain migration. We have had it for 40 /50 years, it was done in the 1960s and it crowds out immigrants that could be a catalyst for higher sustained economic growth. And we are the only country that has it.
14:07:35
Canada has more economic immigrants coming to its country than the United States and we are 10 times larger in terms of our population. My guess is that if people looked at both systems they would say the Canadian model is a better one for higher growth, and the canadians believe it, that's why they changed their model away from the one that we have to the one that is a winner economically. To be able to complete that sentence about what I am for in the political environment that now I am in, is an extraordinary opportunity, I thank you for the question.
14:08:10
Q: I am concerned about ISIS for all the obvious reasons, but also because when they take over a city they go in and start teaching the children to hate non- muslims. and to me that's just gonna grow thing exponentially against non-muslims.
JB: Absolutely.
Q: To me it says we gotta take out ISIS sooner rather than later, before they pollute all these young minds, and just make things much worse. I don't see a good path of destroying ISIS. There must be one, but I don't know it. Could you describe how you see it, how do you see us taking them out?
14:08:46
JB: First of all I would do something that this president hasn't done which is I wouldn't dictated to the military conditions on their warfighting capabilities, I'd ask for options for the ultimate goal of destroying ISIS, not to contain it. The president effectively had a policy of containment, now it don't look so pretty. Cause containment means they garner strength and to your point, the longer they are there they doubled the number of recruits into the caliphate and now they create a pretty powerful group in Libya. ISIS affiliated. They have impacts now in other countries, like Afghanistan and other parts of North Africa. They are a real threat to Tunisia. They are, I think 6,000 tunisia ISIS fighter and Tunisia is the one country that they are threatened by because it's the one country that is moving in the other direction. Where they are moving towards a moderate Islamic country with more democracy, the rest of the countries are tightening their domestic situation and Tunisia is moving in the proper way. So the strategy has to be comprehensive, it has to use our airpower, it has to we have to be engaged on the ground.
14:10:00
Putting preconditions about, look, people say, afterwards maybe they won't because there's another subject the press is more interested in today but generally when you say that you will listen to the military advisors and they say well how many people will you have on the ground, that's the obsession of the political environment, is a special operator a boot on the ground? Having boots on the ground, I would say yeah. We have 3500 of them, they are just not deployed the right way in Iraq. They are not embedded with the military, they are not training with the intensity necessary, they are not forward leaning to be able to identify the targets that would make it more relevant.
14:10:36
The resources that we're spending to be successful, and in Syria we have this disparate group of people that despise Assad and despise ISIS but they are not mobilized because there is no unity because there is no leader. And the US can play that constructive role. I don't think militarily this is a great challenge, it's the geopolitical dynamic, and then what do you do to sustain the stability afterwards, that is the challenge that requires more than just more fighting that requires creating a secure Syria and a secure Iraq, the outcomes may be different in both countries by the way but that's the long haul effort.
14:11:19
And there's clearly until recently there hasn't been the energy to convince people that we need, that we need to make a long term commitment, I think now americans realize that if we don't deal with that there it's coming our way, one other thing I'd say is, as we, back to Iran here, this agreement with Iran has huge implications beyond the legitimacy, legitimizing the Iranian regime which should not have received any legitimacy from the US. It makes it harder for us to make the arab world along in this regards, it makes it harder for us to make it a compelling case to the turks or to the Egyptians who feel abandoned by the US or to persian gulf countries that we are serious.
14:12:11
That we are going to have their back that they security umbrella that they've relied upon is going to be there because it looks as though in their minds that we've changed teams and that Sunni-Shia fight inside of these areas is what dominates their thinking far more than ISIS right now, and so we've made a huge tactical mistake and I think a strategic blunder by secretly first and then unilaterally making these concessions with the Iranians, we're not any safer and we're certainly weaker because of what we did.
14:12:44
Q: You have been speaking about ISIS and the terrorism threat overseas, can you talk a little bit about the terrorism happening, well the violence happening here both terrorism and those shootings that haven't [unclear]
14:13:00
JB: Well, I would, I know there is a tendency to lump all this together, I don't. Deranged people, there have been some like moral equivalence of some deranged mentally sick person who goes and kills innocent people in an isolated case and then comparing that to a caliphate the size of Indiana with 30,000 battle tested warriors that get hundreds of millions of dollars to fuel their ambition to destroy western civilization. There is no moral equivalence here. But they are both tragic in that there is the outcome of killing innocent people. That's the commonality. But someone who is radicalized that is acting on a twisted belief that their religion compels them to kill innocent people is far different than someone who is mentally deranged. You have to deal with them separately and independently. And I think as it relates to the former we need to make sure that we protect the homeland. That any interaction that people have with homegrown terrorists that we intervene as quickly as possible using all the tools available, not tie our hands behind our back.
14:14:15
There are safeguards in the patriot act programs, in the metadata program, there is not one shred of evidence that anybody's personal privacy rights have been violated by this but we took it away.
14:14:30
And the NSA is part of the effort to protect the homeland, so I think we need to redouble our effort in that regard. Secondly I think the federal government needs to, and I've talked to a lot of local law enforcement about this, I think they need to really redouble their efforts to open up the FBI and be more transparent and cooperative with local and state law enforcement agencies because ultimately that's where the eyes and ears of professional law enforcement officers are right now. It might have been that you could have identified this couple before they did their act had that been the case, you don't know.
14:15:05
But clearly when you're dealing with exponentially more law enforcement officers at the local level than you are at the FBI they need partners in this and I get it, just my own personal experience, the FBI is better than it was but it's still a very insular kind of organization and they need to change that culture. And then third this effort of protecting the homeland is best done overseas, and this is a place by the way where it's time for a reset button on immigration law as well.
14:15:35
We have to sort this stuff out, this is a new phenomenon, how do you screen people that are possibly being embedded inside of refugee migration? How do you deal with the visa waiver program? You know where Germans and Belgians and you know people have a passport they have expedited process to come to the United States, well, if they have been radicalized, then there is much a threat as the american citizen was in San Bernardino. I think we need to go through all of this, what we shouldn't do is to just, you know, say all muslims aren't coming in to our country. you gotta find the proper balance of believing in American values and being serious and real about keeping us safe. It's not about the blowhards out there just saying stuff, that's not a program, that's not a plan. This is serious business.
14:16:30
And We shouldn't along the way do doing exactly what these radical islamic terrorists want. They want us to marginalize muslims so they move in their direction rather than in our direction. That's what they're doing in Europe and we do not need that in the United States.
14:16:47
Q: Thank you for speaking to us today. In response to the gentlemen here earlier you said that half the voters are not your enemy, and I appreciate that very much.
JB: Only half the people that send tweets out of my twitter feed, they apparently think that I am their enemy, so. [LAUGHTER]
Q: Being on the other side I am glad to not be your enemy. When and if you win and are elected president.
JB:your leading candidate actually said that, I wasn't making that up.
Q: No, I believe you, I didn't see it, but I believe you. What I was gonna ask you is when you become president you are going to be privy to significantly more information and you'd be making geometrically more impactful decisions in your day to day life. SO one of the things that is very important to me is to see your mind at work and would ask you Sir. is there a circumstance where you felt very strongly about one situation and were turned around from argument from somebody who was on the other side? Thank you Sir.
14:17:56
JB: Yea. Great question. Those are always the tough questions, I get this once in awhile, not often. That's a good question.I, the one thing in my political life where my views have evolved, not so much because someone persuaded me, it's just the circumstances of being involved and over time eroded my confidence in, the program was capital punishment. And partially my faith,but principally the system was so broken and there are lots of things in life where it's not all black and white, where you have to make a judgement based on two bad possibilities or maybe one good possibility, one less good, but it's always, you always have to make a choice. And listening, having the humility to know what you don't know is the first step in making a really robust decision.
14:18:49
And then allowing yourself to not be so stubborn that you can evolve if it's well thought out. Capital punishment is the one that I suffered with as governor because it was so poorly administered and so complex and the courts made it really, capital punishment at least in Florida at the end was not a deterrent, which I think for it to be administered properly it should be a deterrent. But the other side, this is why it was a challenge, I met with the family members of people who lost their loved ones, you know, victims to these horrendous crimes. And when you look them in the eye and they tell you that justice is not being, you know, justice has been delayed and denied by a twenty year time it takes at extraordinary costs for an execution to take place, you gotta be sympathetic to that as well. Other views. Look, my views have been shaped, I'll tell you a story that changed my views, not necessarily that I had an opposing view but I wasn't sensitized to something.
14:19:56
JB: In 1998 I was a candidate for governor and was in a town hall meeting about this size in Fort Lauderdale and a lady raised her hand, she's now a friend, her name is Berthie Aponte de La Rosa, she was not a republican at the time, and she said you don't care about my family. I never met her, I said well I don't know, do I look like I don't care about you and your family? And she said here's my case, my daughter is 15 years old, she can't talk, she can't walk, she has severe autism, she has incredible physical challenges, and she has an IQ of 50, and my biggest fear and Milton my husband's biggest fear is whether I'm going to outlive Lucy. And you don't care about that because you're a conservative, effectively is what she said. So I couldn't convince her that I cared, and what I did was I asked her to be my teacher which was a little different than the typical politician and I learned so much about the programs for the developmentally disabled.
14:21:08
It was 4 full days. I went to group homes, I went to institutional care, I went to workplaces where people with developmental disabilities were treated with dignity and respect and other places where they were warehoused. I learned about the complete incompetence of the program in Florida and I got elected in the first week, a federal judge summoned me to his courtroom to say I'm taking over the program for the developmentally disabled. It never came up in the campaign and I said, I know about this now. Don't do this I actually, I know how to fix this and I got the money from the legislature and we transformed the programs and in 18 months we ended up with 31 thousand people being taken off a waiting list, and the way I describe it is it's 31 thousand families that worried less about whether they were going to outlive their child.
14:22:02
So that learning experience requires the humility to listen and have the ability to learn, and then you have the, if you have a chance to lead, lead with a vengeance, and if you talk to people in Florida they will say that I was the strongest supported for the programs for the developmentally disabled and I'm a conservative republican and proud of it. That process of learning is just life really, doesn't quite answer your question. If you get stuck in the world we're in, you can end up with a government that looks like it's still in 1975 because that's the government we got. If you just, if everything has to be the status quo, it's a disaster. You have to evolve, you can be true to your principles, your compass can always point north, but you gotta have the ability to listen and learn a little bit along the way, leadership is not about the big personality on the stage it's about the humility to be able to garner the kind of support to fix the things that are broken.
14:23:00
And um, it's what I believe in my heart.
Q; Rightly so a lot of the conversation of late has been about national security, and foreign affairs. Prior to some of the recent events, jobs and the economy was the number one issue on the minds of many voters and I'd be really interested in perhaps you could close with what's the Governor Bush's Economic plan, what are the one or two key things that upon taking office you think will make the most difference in jump starting and growing the economy.
14:23:50
JB: We could grow our economy if we fixed our immigration system and got beyond the political arguments and turned our immigration system into an economic driver, and secondary that would be part of this because our demography also requires, we need to be younger and more productive over the long haul to keep a 4 percent growth going, but if we embrace the energy revolution in our midst, and that is 40% of all the growth in the economy since the start of the recovery has been in the energy sector and it's not in the windmills and all that stuff, it's in the oil and gas sector principally, it is a massive driver of capital investment and high wage job growth, it's undeniable. So embracing that, not trying to push it away but it's a huge American success story and it will help us from a national security point of view, from a growth point of view, it's the best deal american consumers have gotten with lower gasoline prices and lower utility prices.
14:24:52
And there's a set of things, limiting the export ban, extending the leases, accelerating leases on Federal lands and waters, dealing with the EPA rules that are trying to destroy and oil and gas sector. All these things, just bring common sense regulation to the field would be helpful. Secondly our tax code is the most convulded in the industrial world. I think we should move away from world wide taxation to territorial taxation, we should have so we're eliminating these inversions, the need to invert that's ridiculous. We should have reversions or whatever the opposite is because this is still the largest market and the best place to do business if we fix how we regulate. So the proposal I have is to lower the corporate tax rate to 20%, eliminate all of the carve outs and deductions. Allow for full expensing of capital investment in business which is the single biggest thing that you can do to jumpstart high wage growth and job growth and then simplify the tax code for individuals, double the exemption so that people making 40 grand or less in a family of 4 wouldn't have to pay federal income tax.
14:26:02
The argument against it is well it's, the government is going to lose, well it's not their money for crying out loud, and we can curb spending on the government side, we shouldn't be viewing it as theirs and they are giving it back to us, there's ways also to create some fairness by putting a cap on the expenditures and deductions that higher income people disproportionately take. And on regulations , we need to stand the stern revamp, wherever possible regulations ought to be shifted back to the state's and where it is proper for the federal government to play a role, we need to have a regulatory budget, where every dollar of additional expense requires the executive branch to reduce a regulations expense, that you have zero increase in regulatory costs, and bring about certainty by administrative procedures reform. All sort of things, we are mired in the mid twentieth century. It takes 10 years for a large infrastructure project to get permitted now, because of the federal government side of this.
14:27:08
There should be a minimum or maximum of two years, and there are ways to do this, this is not the most complicated thing in the world it's just that all the special interest like it this way. Could we build the interstate highway system today, the answer is no. Could we launch a man on the moon, could we have built the defense department. That took 17 months, 6 million square feet in a swamp on a roof. 19 months excuse me. We can do these things but it's going to require a dramatic change and if you did those three things alone and then dealt with the budget, structural budget problems we face, we could grow at 4% and 4% growth would change the dynamic of this country we would be a lot more optimistic about the future for sure. Thank you guys I appreciate you all.