00:00:00:00 - Pyongtak, South Korea 6/11/97 soldiers at attention in large field while theme from M*A*S*H plays then they do stretcher races across field, at the end of the race, they dump the perosn ...

Full title reads: "Korea Airmen Blood Donors" <br/> <br/>At Sea off Korea. The entire Company of aircraft carrier USS Boxer give a pint of blood each. <br/> <br/>MV Plane landing on USS Boxer (first 7 feet for super.) MV Ratings laying on beds giving blood. CU sailor. CU Orderlies shaking bottle of blood by sailor. MV Ratings forming numbers 2377 on flight deck. SV Helicopter. CU Cargo of blood. <br/> <br/>SV orderlies removing blood. SV Wounded soldier receiving transfusion in MASH. CU Nurse. CU Doctors and orderlies around giving transfusion. CU Plasma bottle. MV Hospital tent. <br/> <br/>(Orig.F.G.) (Orig."E")

[Korean War - Chinese Reds Enter War, 1950] Map of Korea Chinese movement. Chinese and North Korean POWs are marched out of hills around Hamburg and Wonsan across the Wonsan airport to landing craft to be evacuated. Shows difference between Chinese and N. Korean soldier uniforms (Koreans in rags). [10:17:16] U.S. wounded are evacuated by jeep, ambulance, and helicopter, given blood plasma at battalion field hospitals, and flown to hospitals in Japan.VS men on stretchers being carried to hospial, where they are bandaged. Good int. shots of hospital (ala MASH). Good shot of large paratrooper jump. Wounded are loaded into helicopter.Wounded are unloaded in Japan. [10:20:44] Maryland: Members of the Ordinance Association inspect exhibits at the Aberdeen Proving Ground including Russian artillery and armor captured by North Korea and newly developed U.S. snorkel tanks and waterproof jeeps for crossing rivers. VS of the different Russian weapons. VS of the jeep, tank, and snorkel-truck being tested. Machine guns compared on field.

fILE VIDEO OR B-ROLL FROM THE KOREAN WAR. KOREAN ARMISTICE DAY.

COLONEL EARL YOUNG'S HOME MOVIES - KOREAN WAR VIETNAM WAR

U.S. Army MASH (Mobile Army Surgical Hospital) at K-51 Inje Airfield in South Korea during the Korean War. Interiors of MASH operating room in a hut. U.S. Marine Corps 1st Medical Battalion surgeons and assistants work on a patient. Men operate on the patient. Location: Inje Korea. Date: December 1951.

PICTORIAL REPORT NO.2 VARIETY FILM ON QM AERIAL SUPPLY COMPANY & STORY OF 8209 MOBILE ARMY SURGICAL HOSPITAL. (MASH) PLUS SHOTS IN KOREA & IN 21 MASH UNIT

At Panmunjom in Korea, G.I.'s raise a tent city to receive the wounded and ill prisoners of war slated to be returned from Red captivity. Already on hand are medical personnel and facilities, an ambulance train, and helicopters to airlift the seriously ill to hospital areas.

1400 STATE BRIEF FS21 71 UNDERSECRETARY OF STATE FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS STEVE GOLDSTEIN BRIEFING JANUARY 11, 2018 SPEAKERS: UNDERSECRETARY OF STATE FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS STEVE GOLDSTEIN DIRECTOR OF POLICY PLANNING BRIAN HOOK [*] GOLDSTEIN: Hi, it's Steve Goldstein. I'm the undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs. I will be doing the briefing today, and I'm joined by Brian Hook. Of note, I'm happy to say that Heather's son is doing much better, and I would expect her back at the podium next Tuesday, and no one will be more happier to see her than I. What we're going to do first is have Brian give you a briefing on Vancouver. He'll then take four or five questions, and then he has to go back to his office, and then I will come back up, answer additional questions, and then we'll go around the world, trying to respond to whatever you might have. So first, let me introduce Brian Hook, who I think many of you know is the director of policy planning for the secretary. Brian? HOOK: Thank you, Steve. Good -- good afternoon to all of you. The Vancouver foreign minister's meeting on security and stability in the Korean Peninsula will be held in Vancouver on January 16th. The United States and Canada are convening the meeting to demonstrate international commitment to diplomatic solutions to the escalating threat posed by DPRK's nuclear and ballistic missile programs. The ministerial -- the goal of the ministerial is to provide a practical mechanism -- mechanisms to exert continued pressure on the Kim regime while demonstrating that diplomatic options remain open and viable. The invitation list is largely based on countries who are U.N. command sending states. In which are the countries that send combat support and/or humanitarian aid to support the Republic of Korea during the Korean War. There is growing evidence that our maximum pressure campaign is being felt in North Korea. They are feeling the strain. And we believe that this pressure campaign remains the best avenue to force change in Kim Jong Un's behavior and to get him to negotiating table for meaningful discussions. Among the issues we will be discussing is how the international community can thwart North Korean efforts to evade U.N. sanctions to smuggling. As you know, with the Secretary's patient diplomacy, together with our allies and partners around the world, the administration has increased pressure on the DPRK to new and unprecedented levels. Combined with previous U.N. Security Council resolutions, over 90 percent of North Korea's publicly reported exports as of 2016 are now banned. Many countries are further taking unilateral action to hold the DPRK accountable, and let me give you a few examples. Malaysia kicked out North Korean laborers, Qatar and Kuwait halted work visas to North Koreans, the UAE has completely severed diplomatic ties, Peru, Spain and Italy have all expelled ambassadors. Portugal froze all diplomatic relations with the DPRK in July. As I think as I mentioned in -- in prior interactions with you, in every bi-lat, the Secretary brings up North Korea. And he has done that since the time that we had reached agreement on a North Korea strategy in the National Security Cabinet. And we have seen a lot of this very patient and day-by-day diplomacy yield a lot of results. The goal of this pressure campaign is to persuade the North Korean regime that the only way to achieve peace and stability is to abandon its current path and embrace meaningful dialogue about a different future. The sending states ministerial comes amid the backdrop of renewed talks between North Korea and South Korea over the North's participation in next month's Winter Olympics. President Moon told President Trump that the initial talks on Tuesday went well. We will wait to see where this engagement eventually leads. As always, we are hoping for a diplomatic solution. Secretary Tillerson has been clear that we do not seek regime change or collapse. Nevertheless, we will not rest until the world is assured that the DPRK's pursuit of nuclear weapons has been verifiably abandoned. And then with that brief scene setter, I'm happy to turn it over to questions. STAFF: Matt Lee? QUESTION: I just -- I got to defer to my colleague Matt Pennington (ph), who is going to be on the trip. STAFF: OK, Matt Pennington (ph)? QUESTION: Yeah, I'm over here. Brian, has -- has the complexion of this -- this meeting in Vancouver changed because of the diplomacy that started between the North and the South? I mean, will there be a greater emphasis on -- on seeking a diplomatic engagement with the North, rather just focusing on sanctions' pressure? HOOK: I don't think it's -- I don't think it's going to change the agenda. I think you saw that the President and the Secretary were both very pleased with the interaction between the North and the South. We believe that that was brought about through -- in some part because of the pressure campaign. As I said, we believe that the sanctions, that the North Koreans are starting to feel the bite of a global pressure campaign. And we think that this creates the kind of conditions that lead to discussions between the North and the South about the Olympics. We are going to be at this Vancouver ministerial doing an assessment of progress to-date. We'll be discussing sanctions, the sanctions that we have done multilaterally and unilaterally to-date, and their effectiveness. And what we can be doing in the coming year. We'll be discussing the importance of non-proliferation, and we'll be discussing diplomatic options to achieve our goals of a denuclearized Korean peninsula. STAFF: Andrea (ph)? QUESTION: What steps would be considered to try to thwart smuggling, especially the kind of refueling we've seen at sea? Would any kind of a naval operation be considered? Some have suggested, including a former NATO Supreme Allied Commander that a naval blockade is actually the only option. HOOK: At Vancouver, we will be discussing maritime interdiction. We continue to explore all options to enhance maritime security and the ability to interdict maritime traffic, those transporting goods to and from the DPRK that support the nuclear and missile program. And we will be discussing with our partners and allies the kind of steps that we can take on maritime interdiction and also to be cutting, disrupting funding and disrupting resources. And maritime interdiction helps us to disrupt resources. And then the financial side helps us to disrupt the financing of their nuclear and missile program. STAFF: OK, Arshan (ph)? QUESTION: How -- how do you hope to effectively crack down on smuggling to or by North Korea on trade on financial transfers without having China at such a meeting? And did the United States favor or oppose China attending the meeting? HOOK: We have had regular discussions with the Chinese about the problem that we're having about resources and funding making its way illegally to North Korea. We've been very pleased that China has certainly given much fuller implementation. I think they had closed some sanctions gaps. They are doing a better job at implementing the U.N. Security Council resolutions. We've had four U.N. Security Council resolutions in this administration that the Chinese supported. HOOK: We also know that this is necessary but insufficient. And we need to be doing more to deal with vessels that are engaging in prohibited activities under U.N. Security Council resolutions. One of the things that we're looking at, we -- we hope that the U.N. can list some of these vessels for port-entry bans. And we think that that will demonstrate seriousness of purpose if we can start having more of these vessels listed. So that we can then -- they can be banned from entering other ports. We need to drive up the consequences for any vessels that are engaged in this kind of activity. With respect to China and the Vancouver Ministerial, we will give them a readout of this ministerial after it's over. And we have been in discussions with the Chinese and the Russians, leading up to this Vancouver Ministerial. This is based on sending states. China and Russia were not sending states, but... (CROSSTALK) HOOK: They -- they weren't U.N. sending states. That was my point. QUESTION: But would -- wouldn't it be better -- wouldn't your ability to exert pressure be greater if you had, with you, the largest trade partner and the regional heavyweight, China? HOOK: Well, China is working with us. This is not an alternative to everything that we are doing. This ministerial will enhance and strengthen all of the efforts under way, to achieve our policy goals. China has the same policy goal, in terms of ensuring that North Korea does not become a nuclear weapon state and acquire the means to deliver a nuclear warhead. So there is broad agreement in the international community about the end state. This Vancouver Ministerial is something which supports all of our efforts collectively. And we have been in touch with China and Russia on this ministerial, and we will be giving them a readout when it's over. End of discussion. And it will be very helpful. I think that they will welcome a lot of the actions that come out of the discussion because it all rolls up into the same policy end state. STAFF: Thank you -- Nate? QUESTION: What is a clear sort of concrete deliverable you hope to get out of this meeting? Is it progress toward a new Security Council resolution, is it charting a path forward on new sanctions? And as part of this campaign, is the U.S. considering advocating for secondary sanctions against major Chinese banks, to further clamp down on North Korean finances? HOOK: We very much want the Vancouver Ministerial to be an assessment, a -- an assessment of where we're making progress, and areas where we need to do more. And so this will not be this -- this is not just for sort of P.R. value. We want very concrete steps. We will be discussing concrete steps that we can all be taking to help increase the campaign. As we said from the beginning, this is a campaign of global and escalating pressure. It's a maximum-pressure campaign. And that campaign will continue, in some form or another, until we achieve our policy goals. Our security objectives. And the -- the great benefit of a meeting like this, is it allows many, many countries to come together and to discuss interdiction, to discuss nonproliferation, to discuss maritime activities, to discuss denying the regime the resources and the funding that it needs. And will also be to talk -- also talk about diplomacy. And how all of that fits together so that we have -- we certainly have put the credible military threat on the table. And -- but our -- our definite preference is for a negotiated solution. QUESTION: Chinese banks? (CROSSTALK) QUESTION: Chinese banks? Can you just answer the question on... HOOK: Oh, on Chinese banks? Well, we have, in our discussions, I remember when the secretary, in his initial discussions with the Chinese -- we have been very clear with them about the action that we need them to take against individuals or entities that -- that are under Chinese control, that are contributing, in whatever fashion, to helping or facilitating or supporting North Korea's nuclear missile program. We've asked them to take action. They have taken action in some areas. We take secondary sanctions -- we will impose secondary sanctions when we need to. And that's something which the Chinese understand, very clearly, from our conversations. STAFF: This is the last question. QUESTION: OK. So two quick questions. You said that the global -- global pressure campaign that's, you know, been put forth by the U.S. is one of the reasons that's created the conditions that have led to these discussions between North Korea and South Korea. Can you expand on that? Because it seems, from an outsider's perspective, that it's actually just inviting them to, you know, talks without them actually committing to anything that you guys want them to commit to. And then the second question is, are U.S. and North Korea talks a possibility at the Olympics? HOOK: Well, on the first question, you're saying that you don't think that the pressure campaign has -- I'm not sure what you mean. QUESTION: How is it creating the environment that led to these -- led to these talks, if it's, you know, just looking like North Korea can say they want talks, can show up at the Olympics. And they're not really, you know, facing the heat that you guys -- or making the changes that they want -- you want them to make? HOOK: Well, North Korea came to the South and said that they would be willing to talk about the Olympics, and so we were pleased that -- that they had that conversation. It was largely limited to the Olympics. It is -- you've seen what the president and the secretary have both said about it. The president has said that he believes that this -- that this climate that we have helped to create through the pressure campaign promotes, and enables and encourages this sorts of interaction. But this was largely limited to the Olympics. And there really is -- I don't think -- I don't read much beyond it, other than that. And your second question was? QUESTION: Is it possible to consider U.S.-North Korea talks at the Olympics? HOOK: No. STAFF: OK. Thank you so much. HOOK: OK. Thanks. STAFF: Thank you again. GOLDSTEIN: Dave, welcome. OK. So let's go over the trip, just briefly. The secretary will leave on Monday. The meetings will take place in Vancouver on Tuesday. On Wednesday morning, he will go to Stanford where, at noon, he will give a speech with open press to the Hoover Institute. He was invited by Secretary Rice, and Secretary Shultz will co-host the speech. Secretary will speak, and then he will take questions on the podium from Secretary Rice and -- former Secretary Rice and former Secretary Shultz. And then, after, he will then come back to New York -- to Washington. Also, tomorrow morning at 10:30, the secretary and Acheson will swear in a class, a new civil service class. That will also be open press. Now, let's -- I can start with whatever country you'd like, or we can continue questions. QUESTION: Let's start with Iran. GOLDSTEIN: OK. QUESTION: So I'm just curious, if you could -- When the secretary was asked about Iran sanctions waivers, the president's decision this morning, you said that he's going to get the chance, I guess, to -- to make a decision today. Are -- some have taken that to believe that a decision and an announcement will happen today. Is that -- is that incorrect -- an incorrect meaning, or do you still expect this to be tomorrow? GOLDSTEIN: Well, there have been ongoing discussions about this for at least a week. The secretary -- Tillerson, Secretary Mattis and the president and others, you know, started this at Camp David, and the secretary's been at the White House almost every day -- almost every day. He was there yesterday for many, many hours. The decision meeting is this afternoon, and from that, the decision will be made. I'm not sure when the announcement will be, whether it will be tonight, or whether it will be tomorrow. But we do expect a decision to be made later today. QUESTION: Are you persuaded by what the U.K. union (ph) today, their -- their statement? Because they advocated more to stay with -- with the deal. Are you in any way influenced by that? GOLDSTEIN: The president and the secretary have all the facts in front of them, and ultimately, it will be the president's decision. They will have a long discussion about this today, as they have all throughout the week, and a decision will be made. Andrea (ph)? QUESTION: How (inaudible) that have the protests, if at all, complicated a decision, given widespread analysis that any withdrawal or blowing up of the Iran deal at this point would help the hardliners, and undermine any efforts towards moderation in Iran? GOLDSTEIN: I don't think we should conflate the two. The fact is that the -- we've encouraged -- we're -- we're encouraged that President Rouhani in Iran has allowed social media sites to open. We still encourage the government of Iran to allow protesters to dissent, and we hope they will continue to do so. We do not support any crackdown on dissenters. Felicia (ph)? QUESTION: In October, when the Trump administration rolled out the strategy, Tillerson said that he hoped by January there'd be an agreement on legislation -- trigger points, I think, is how he described them. Obviously, that legislation's not going to happen this week, but I guess, one, is the secretary satisfied with the progress? And two, if January was the old deadline, does the administration and the secretary have a new deadline for when they'll (ph) see that happen? (CROSSTALK) GOLDSTEIN: Well, there are -- thank you. There are 20 more days in January. But first, let's get to the decision today, and at that point, we'll make a further determination, and I'll try to give you an answer to that next week. QUESTION: How involved is the secretary? I know that there's been a lot of meetings at the White House and the NSC on the legislation negotiations. How involved has the secretary been? GOLDSTEIN: The secretary's very involved in all decisions relating to foreign policy. Rich (ph)? QUESTION: Steve, how much do the -- and are in (ph) Congressional discussions have to do with the president's decision that he's going to make, apparently, today? GOLDSTEIN: We have not halted funded -- funding to ANRA (ph). The decision's under review, and there's still deliberations taking place. I think that we are looking at this decision for what it is, and the president will make a decision based on all the information he has, including information from the Secretary of State, and from other -- from the secretary of defense, and others. But we are confident that we will get to the right place. I would expect an announcement either later today, or early tomorrow morning. QUESTION: What -- what's the right place? GOLDSTEIN: Well, that -- that -- that's for the president to announce, and that will occur soon. QUESTION: Well, but you have -- you have your own... GOLDSTEIN: Yes, ma'am? QUESTION: Can I just follow up on that as well? GOLDSTEIN: Well, hold on. Let -- let's -- let's let everyone ask -- have the opportunity to ask one question first. QUESTION: Can I go back to Vancouver meeting? GOLDSTEIN: Yes. QUESTION: First of all, could you please clarify if China and Russia were invited to this meeting? GOLDSTEIN: No, China and Russia were not invited to the meeting. China and Russia will be informed of the results of the meeting right when it is over. Most important to note is that China and Russia strongly support what we are doing. We're all together in belief that North Korea must provide a plan for denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. We all share the same view. Yes, sir? QUESTION: In -- in response to Rick's (ph) question, which I think was about UNRRA. GOLDSTEIN: OK. QUESTION: In other words, aid to the UN. GOLDSTEIN: Thank you. QUESTION: Right? You then said I'm confident that we'll get to the right place. GOLDSTEIN: Yes. QUESTION: When you said I'm confident that we'll get to the right place, were you talking about Iran and the decision on Iran sanctions, waivers? GOLDSTEIN: I was answering the question that was asked of me. QUESTION: I was -- I was actually asking UNRRA (ph). GOLDSTEIN: Oh, I'm sorry. QUESTION: UNRRA (ph). It sounded at the end that you were answering also UNRRA (ph), so. What does that change at the end? QUESTION: So -- so getting to the right place applies to what? To UNRRA (ph) and Iran? Or to UNRRA (ph)? GOLDSTEIN: It implies -- it applies to all decisions that we make. (LAUGHTER) GOLDSTEIN: Look, the -- the Secretary -- of course it does. The Secretary of State, along with the President, along with the National Security Council and others who were involved regarding Iran have met all this week. The decision meeting is occurring currently, there will be a decision announced on that. As it relates to any other issue, we follow the same process in making a decision. QUESTION: That decision is going to be today or tomorrow, as well? The Palestinian ... GOLDSTEIN: No. No, I didn't say that. I said that -- no we did not -- I did not say that that decision would be made. That -- deliberations are still taking place and we have not made a decision on that. Yes? QUESTION: (inaudible), Afghan independent journalist. GOLDSTEIN: Yes, ma'am. QUESTION: May I ask you about the Iran situation impact to Afghanistan? Any impact to Afghanistan situation you don't find sufficient (ph)? GOLDSTEIN: We will get back to you on that. QUESTION: Sure. GOLDSTEIN: Alyssa (ph)? Yes. QUESTION: On the Vancouver meeting, Brian mentioned maritime interdiction would be a topic of discussion. GOLDSTEIN: Yes. QUESTION: Are you going to be discussing something akin to a blockade, and if that's the case, is there any concern that North Korea would take that as an act of war? GOLDSTEIN: I think we'll look at all things on the table. All things will be on the table, but we've been very clear that -- that the sanctions are -- have been effective. And what we want is for North Korea to come to the table. We're pleased that they're sending athletes to the Olympics. We're pleased that people from North Korea are able to go and witness the Olympics, and that they'll be marching as part of the community of nations. But that is a start. At some point, they need to come to the table and at some point soon, with a plan for how they're going to denuclearize this peninsula and it has to be irreversible. So until that point occurs, all things are on the table. Yes, hi. QUESTION: Hi, we've talked a little bit about who's not going to be at this summit, but could you offer us a little more specificity on who has said that they're attending and at what level? GOLDSTEIN: We'll get back to you with the names, but South Korea will be attending. QUESTION: I have a follow-up. So Chinese foreign ministry is describing this meeting as Cold War thinking, because you only invite UN sending countries. What's the reason behind it, and what's your response to Chinese criticism that this may harm the joint international effort on North Korea? GOLDSTEIN: I haven't seen that statement, but with all due respect that is not how we or our Canadian hosts would describe that meeting. We will -- once the meeting is over, we will call. We will talk to our counterparts in China and Russia. We will inform them, we've been given no indication that China and Russia's position has changed regarding these sanctions. And their position is what our position is. Yes? QUESTION: So it's been announced that General Mattis will be at the welcome dinner, I believe. What is his role going to be at the -- at the event? GOLDSTEIN: To welcome the countries that are at the event. QUESTION: Just welcoming? He's not going to be at any of the -- in the meetings, participating? GOLDSTEIN: General Mattis of -- of course -- will likely participate in some of the meetings. I refer you to the Department of Defense, but we're pleased that General Mattis is able to be there. QUESTION: Secretary Mattis. GOLDSTEIN: One second. I'm sorry? QUESTION: On North Korea. GOLDSTEIN: Yes? QUESTION: Recently, President Trump mentioned that open to talks with North Korea, but not without preconditions. Has the U.S. changed their position toward North Korea? GOLDSTEIN: No, we've not changed our position. The -- the -- we're pleased that North Korea's agreed to come to the -- participate in the Olympic Games. That's good for South Korea and it's good for North Korea, and it will also be good for the figure skaters and others from North Korea who come to South Korea and are able to interact with people from all different nations, including the United States. QUESTION: But you -- you opened the talks with North Korea with preconditions or without the preconditions, what is that? GOLDSTEIN: Our position's very clear. North Korea needs to come to the table. The President stated what -- what our position is, the Secretary's reiterated it. We need negotiation. Matt, I'm sorry, you had something? No, OK. QUESTION: I do, but not ... GOLDSTEIN: OK, go ahead. QUESTION: ... from the Financial Times. GOLDSTEIN: Hi, Katrina (ph). QUESTION: Hi. Can I just check, when you say that China and Russia were not invited. Is there anything in Canada suggesting they should be invited, and the U.S. in fact say no? And can I confirm that China will in fact attend some side meetings in Vancouver? GOLDSTEIN: I will get back to you on that, but Canada is hosting the meeting and we concurred with the decision. Dmitri (ph)? Please use the microphone. QUESTION: Can I follow up on that one point, please? GOLDSTEIN: OK, Alysse (ph)? QUESTION: Canada made the decision not to invite China and Russia, or was that made in conjunction with you and Canada? GOLDSTEIN: It was made in conjunction and again, we will inform China and Russia after the meeting where things stand. They are -- we are all in agreement that these sanctions need to be implemented. We are also in agreement that the -- that the sanctions are working. But we're also in agreement that North Korea must come to the table. Dmitri (ph)? Can you use the microphone, if you don't mind? QUESTION: The port entry ban idea that Mr. Hook mentioned, has -- have you discussed it with the Russians and the Chinese in any way, shape or form? GOLDSTEIN: Is your question have we discussed with the Russians and Chinese? QUESTION: A port entry ban, a ban for some of the North Korean vessels, to entry -- to enter ports abroad. GOLDSTEIN: Yes, sir. Everything's that's discussed at the meeting we will share with our -- with Russia and with China, along with all the other countries that are at the meeting. As I said after the meeting, we plan to contact China and Russia. Josh (ph)? QUESTION: Ambassador Pete Hoekstra in the Netherlands had his debut before the -- the Dutch media. It didn't go real well. Just to start off, does the State Department agree with his earlier comments that politicians have been burned as a result of Islamist movements, and that there are no-go zones in the Netherlands? GOLDSTEIN: No. The State Department does not agree with those statements. That is not the language we would use. QUESTION: Would you like the Ambassador to maybe retract those, given all of the controversy it seems to be causing? GOLDSTEIN: The Ambassador, with -- when he was an Ambassador Designate in December, when this initially started, issued a statement on Twitter that said "for the last 17 years, I've been passionate about confronting the global threat of terrorism." The person Josh (ph) is referring to is Pete Hoekstra, who was sworn in yesterday as the Ambassador to the Netherlands, former member of Congress from Michigan. "This has been a long struggle, we still have much to learn. I made certain remarks in 2015 and regret the exchange during the new sir (ph) interview. Please accept my apology. I was born in the Netherlands and love this country. It would be the greatest honor of my life to serve as the United States Ambassador to the Netherlands. I look forward to the opportunity to learn, to listen and to move on in the spirit of peace and friendship with the people and the leaders of Netherlands. Merry Christmas and a blessed New Year." His position on that hasn't changed. I agree that yesterday -- that the Ambassador did not answer some of the questions that were asked of him. He recognizes that. He is going to do a long-form interview tomorrow, that is the plan, with a Dutch outlet. And he also plans over the weekend to be available within many of the communities in the -- in -- in the capital, including Muslim communities. And it is a great honor for Ambassador Hoekstra to service the Netherlands. And we are hopeful that we can move beyond this. He's excited about the opportunity to be able to help the people of the Netherlands. QUESTION: The quickest way to move beyond it, it seems to me, would be for him to actually say that he was mistaken and -- or incorrect in 2015 when he made the comments that have got the Dutch upset. No? GOLDSTEIN: He did say in December that he made certain remarks in 2015 and regrets the exchange. And I've indicated ... QUESTION: But the remarks he made in 2015 weren't just something that you apologize for, they were wrong. They were -- they -- with -- it was factually incorrect. GOLDSTEIN: Right, but I've indicated that ... QUESTION: Apologizing for them is one thing, but he was asked yesterday to retract them, which he did not do. GOLDSTEIN: Yes. But I've indicated clearly that that is not the view of the Department. QUESTION: Does that mean the Department has told him that he should retract his comments? GOLDSTEIN: The Department has -- has had conversations with the Ambassador. The Ambassador wants to get this behind him. He is very committed to serving the people of the Netherlands as a United States representative. This is the greatest honor of his life. And he -- and again, he will be giving ... QUESTION: ... United States, which is why he is there. GOLDSTEIN: He will be -- I appreciate that. He will be giving an interview tomorrow and he will be available throughout the Netherlands. And I have advised, as I have advised most people, that when reporters are in front of you, just as you are in front of me, that it's always good to answer questions. (LAUGHTER) QUESTION: Does that mean -- does that mean that he will? When he is -- when he is asked in this interview tomorrow, which he certainly will be, I'm sure he will be. That he still thinks or still believes that there are no-go zones in the Netherlands and that politicians have been set on fire? Will he answer the question? GOLDSTEIN: You should turn in to that interview tomorrow. I've been very clear on what our position is. QUESTION: ... that those statements were inaccurate? GOLDSTEIN: Well I did say that. I said that's not the position of the Department. QUESTION: No, that's different. It's different. Not the position of the Department of State is different from those statements are inaccurate. GOLDSTEIN: I've been very clear that that's not our position, that is not language that we would use, and that is not language you will ever hear me use or Heather use from this podium. Let's -- let's do one at a time, I'm sorry. QUESTION: Can you just say that it's wrong? Can you just say that -- that what he said in 2015 on this television show is just factually incorrect? That it doesn't have any basis of truth? GOLDSTEIN: I've been very clear on what our position is. I -- I'm not sure how I can be more clear, other than to make the point that is -- that is not the view ... QUESTION: You could say that before he is -- before the election, before -- in 2015, three years ago almost, that he made some comments on a television show that were incorrect. GOLDSTEIN: The Ambassador said ... QUESTION: That's how you get it behind, that's how you get ahead on it (ph). GOLDSTEIN: I appreciate that PR advice. (LAUGHTER) GOLDSTEIN: And that's -- I share your view, by the way. The Ambassador made remarks in 2015, and he said very clearly that he regrets the exchange. I think you will -- if you tune in to the interview tomorrow, you will -- he will address this issue. This is -- his -- those comments were not the position of the State Department and you will never hear those words from this podium or -- or in any form. QUESTION: Do you -- do you expect him -- do you expect him to say that he was wrong? GOLDSTEIN: Let's let -- Matt, let's let some other people ask some questions, with all due respect. Let's let some -- let's let some other people ... QUESTION: ... Ambassadors representing the United States to countries where they have previously made factually incorrect statements about the country where they are sent to represent the United States? Why, as a matter of policy, does the State Department have an Ambassador who's made inaccurate statements about the country he's now working in on behalf of the U.S. people? GOLDSTEIN: The Ambassador made mistakes in 2015, made comments that should not have been made. He recognizes that, he apologized in December. He is doing an interview tomorrow. We are -- he is honored to be the Ambassador. The -- the -- he's been received well by the Dutch government, and we hope that he can be received well by the people of the Netherlands. And we have made clear that -- that he must move to get this behind him. And he definitely understands that, he feels great remorse. Yes, sir? QUESTION: On Turkey, two quick questions. GOLDSTEIN: Well hold on, OK. I'll get -- I'll get back to you, Dave. QUESTION: But I'm on this topic, this is Turkey. GOLDSTEIN: OK, OK, Dave? QUESTION: I'm sorry. GOLDSTEIN: I'll get right back to you. I apologize. QUESTION: Yesterday -- yesterday the State Department issued its new wave of travel warnings -- travel advisories. Holland's -- the Netherlands was given a one rating, this place you need to exercise any particular caution going to. Obviously you just said you don't believe there are any no-go zones in Holland, whatever the Ambassador may have said. Are there any no-go zones -- no-go zones because of Islamic extremism in any country of the European Union? GOLDSTEIN: I'll get back to you on that question. That's not the language we would use, as I said. QUESTION: Thank you. Two quick questions on Turkey. One, is there any way that you can first describe to us the relationship between Turkey and U.S.? And the second question is Turkish President Erdogan just yesterday once again accused U.S. government for plotting another coup. Many leading Turkish officials say you've been accusing Turkey almost day-in and day-out, these accusations are coming from (inaudible) to your government. Can you respond to these accusations? GOLDSTEIN: It's in our national interest for Turkey to be a stable, democratic, prosperous and reliable ally. We don't believe language, as you indicated, moves that -- helps us move to that goal. That it's -- it's understandable that Turkey, like most countries, seeks good relationships with its neighbors. We've long supported and we continue to support Turkey's democratic development, because we believe that respect for the rule of law, judicial independence and freedom of the press are sources of Turkey's strength and expand our potential for partnership. QUESTION: I have a question ... GOLDSTEIN: Yes, you may. QUESTION: Thank you, sir. You talked about that they are still deliberating on the issue of Ankara, the Palestinian ... GOLDSTEIN: Yes, sir. QUESTION: ... and works agency. Now, are these deliberations, are they just internal deliberations? Or are you talking to other contributors, like European countries? Like the U.N. itself and so on? To see, you know, how this money, in the past, has been spent, on which areas and so on. GOLDSTEIN: I -- I -- can I go -- I can't give any further guidance to what I did on Tuesday. QUESTION: Right. GOLDSTEIN: In making decisions, we ask all interested parties to provide us with their view before a decision is made. Those deliberations are continuing. QUESTION: But one -- one more. GOLDSTEIN: Yes. In the back. I'm sorry? QUESTION: ... follow-up, if I may. GOLDSTEIN: Hold on. I made our point clear on this question. QUESTION: I understand. I never -- I mean, that's... GOLDSTEIN: I want to be fair to everybody in the room and we have at least 10 people asking questions. QUESTION: It's the Palestine invader (ph) issue. I mean, you know, I have more questions. GOLDSTEIN: I appreciate -- I appreciate your comments but I've been clear on our position. Yes, ma'am? QUESTION: That's on this issue, sir. That's on -- sir. Another issue. GOLDSTEIN: I'll come -- I -- with all due respect, I'll come back to you. But let's let other people ask a question. QUESTION: But we focus on one issue at a time. GOLDSTEIN: Yes, ma'am? QUESTION: Was North Korea invited to the Vancouver meeting? Was it ever considered? And is there a bilat scheduled for Secretary Tillerson and Foreign Minister Kong Xuanyou? GOLDSTEIN: North Korea was not invited to the meeting. North Korea has not indicated that they are ready to put down their nuclear weapons and to denuclearize. They're -- that has to occur before they're -- they would be invited to any such meeting. I would -- I would -- I do believe that the -- that the secretary of state and the foreign minister of South Korea will have an opportunity to interact. One second. Right behind you. I'm sorry? QUESTION: Following up on the travel advisories, Russia did not seem to be too pleased with its ranking on (ph) the new system. And the foreign ministry put out a statement saying that "if U.S. citizens go to Russia en masse, they would be able to see with their own eyes, there is not a trace of what U.S. officials are routinely trying to frighten them with." Do you have a response to that? And, possibly, an update from Ambassador Huntsman being here? GOLDSTEIN: Well, those are two completely different issues. QUESTION: They are. GOLDSTEIN: Ambassador Huntsman was here as part of a routine set of visits to Washington, D.C. He met with the secretary. he was on the Hill for a -- a day and a half. He met with different people in the department, including me, I had the opportunity -- we had the opportunity to talk for over an hour about public diplomacy matters and his support for how we can help enhance what we're doing within Russia. And -- and so that relates to that. As it relates to your question regarding Russia's hyperbole concerning visitation, if people would read the -- the -- look on the website and see what was said, the only goal in the rating system is to help people be safe as they visit countries. We -- if people want to visit Russia, that's within their purview. They -- as long as they follow the appropriate -- get the appropriate passport and visa, that -- that -- absolutely. And book the appropriate plane -- flights or a boat trip. That's their opportunity. And so, you know, I just don't want to engage comments like that. They don't -- they -- they really don't serve any purpose and, in some ways, they discourage Americans from wanting to go there. Yes, ma'am? QUESTION: There are reports that Prime Minister Abe is considering not attending the Olympics because of recent statements by President Moon about the issue of comfort women. Is the State Department talking to Prime Minister Abe to encourage him to attend the Olympics? GOLDSTEIN: I will get back to you on that. We hope for the country of South Korea, that the Olympics is a well-attended event. It's an opportunity for -- for all the nations to come together in sport, and to support our athletes. That is what the Olympics is about. It's about the figure skaters and the skiers and the people that do slalom and biathletes and all others... (UNKNOWN): Luge. GOLDSTEIN: ... and the luge, and every other sport that we in this room like... (LAUGHTER) (UNKNOWN): Curling. GOLDSTEIN: Curling. I'm gonna mention curling, without a doubt. A very interesting sport. My spouse likes that. (UNKNOWN): Indoor rowing. GOLDSTEIN: And -- there's no indoor rowing in the Winter Olympics... (LAUGHTER) GOLDSTEIN: ... but in two years, I will come back to you and talk to you about that in the Summer Olympics, if I'm so lucky. QUESTION: If I may, I would like to ask a quick question on Serbia, regarding the visa rejection of the -- its army chief's visa application to the United States. I understand the State Department usually don't comment on individual visa case. That said, could you please address the possible repercussions? And then respond to Serbian government's comments that there would be consequences in the bilateral relationship? GOLDSTEIN: We just don't discuss any issue relating to the issuance of a visa. QUESTION: So -- but on the same subject, do you have, also, apparently, the foreign minister of Argentina denied a visa to come for medical treatment. And there are instances in which you do discuss visa cases, visa denials, and those instances are when the person who was rejected speaks publicly about that -- about it. And that hadn't happened -- has happened. I don't know about the Serbia case, but has happened in the Argentina case. Can you speak to that? GOLDSTEIN: I can't, but I'll be glad to get back to you on that. QUESTION: Can I -- can I... GOLDSTEIN: Can -- can we -- I will come back to you, but let's... Yes, ma'am? QUESTION: Hi. GOLDSTEIN: Yes? QUESTION: You have expressed concerns about China's unilateral actions to fly through M503 route. But have you talked to your Chinese counterpart about this? And Taiwan has been asking to communicate with China, but they haven't responded yet. So have you encouraged Chinese to talk with Taiwan? GOLDSTEIN: I will get back to you on that. QUESTION: The question of... GOLDSTEIN: OK. Go ahead. (CROSSTALK) STAFF: ... question on Taiwan. QUESTION: ... has -- has the U.S. contacted ICAO on this... GOLDSTEIN: I -- say that again. I apologize. QUESTION: Has the U.S. contacted ICAO regarding this unilateral announcement? Because this is about aviation safety issue. Taiwan government hope that, you know, all the friends and other government can help to convey the message. GOLDSTEIN: Right. So when decisions are made, we communicate with all affected parties. Yes? QUESTION: Yesterday, the Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee came out with this report about the -- Russia's influence campaign abroad. And among the recommendations was a call for a, like, an international, you know, effort with allies on the -- kind of following the model of the coalition to defeat ISIL. Is the State Department, is the secretary of state behind that kind of a recommendation? GOLDSTEIN: We have a Global Engagement Center in the Department of State that -- where -- who -- the funding was increased, actually. And whose job it is to work on the interdiction of ISIS and Boko Haram and others who pose a threat to United States citizens and the citizens of our allies. And we also are very focused on the issue of disinformation, and we are happy that Congress agrees with our intelligence community's assessment. QUESTION: Is -- is the secretary behind a -- creating an effort, specifically, to counter disinformation from -- from Russia? GOLDSTEIN: We have a mechanism designed to do that, called the Global Engagement Center, as I indicated, which is funded. And whose job it is to focus on the issue of disinformation, whether it comes from Russia or China or any other country. QUESTION: The report has specifically criticized the State Department for not activating that Global Engagement Center adequately, saying that Congress had put the money in but that it has not seriously taken its mission, and it's behind the curve on this. And said that the president is guilty of negligence for not doing what the other countries have done to challenge Russia and defend against Russia. GOLDSTEIN: We take the threat of disinformation very seriously. The Global Engagement Center reports to the Under Secretary of Republic Diplomacy. I meet with them very frequently. They've been doing excellent work as it relates to the issue of disinformation and along with interdiction. And they frequently brief the Hill. I received several questions during my hearing. And we respect Senator Cardin, but we don't share the view that the Department of State or the Administration is lacking in that regard. I can tell you that I and my colleagues are very committed to this issue. That it doesn't -- what that -- what that report is missing is a list of the -- of what we have done and what we continue to do. We are awaiting additional funding, which we have been told that we will receive from the Department of Defense in the next couple of months. That hasn't prevented us though, from doing the work that we've had to do. QUESTION: So the -- the -- the report was focused not only on disinformation -- GOLDSTEIN: Yes. QUESTION: -- it talked about a range of behavior that really runs the gamut of, you know, what they call hybrid threats; that disinformation is just a small part of that. GOLDSTEIN: Well, that's what you asked about though, but I appreciate that. QUESTION: Well -- GOLDSTEIN: Go ahead. QUESTION: -- yes, I mean, I said a global influence campaign. GOLDSTEIN: OK. QUESTION: And -- and that in their view includes things like corruption, and money laundering, and -- and transnational crime groups and all kinds of other efforts that they're saying, you know, that's not just a disinformation campaign, but it's kind of a broad spectrum threat. And what -- what they're saying -- what the Democrats that sit on the Foreign Relations Committee are saying is that it requires a different approach than what the State Department is doing. GOLDSEIN: It -- it -- we believe we have a mechanism in place to address these issues. And we are going forward and doing that. We are very respectful of Senator Cardin and the Democrats on the committee. And we've read the report and with great interest. But to say that we are not moving forward on this, that this is not an issue of importance to us, is just not accurate, in all of the areas that you mentioned. Josh (ph)? QUESTION: Ecuador has granted WikiLeaks' Founder, Julian Assange, citizenship. Wondering if you have any reaction to that decision? He's obviously been holed up in their embassy for quite a long time. And is the U.S. still looking to -- to arrest and -- and charge, you know, Mr. Assange? GOLDSTEIN: Well, that's a decision -- the decision to grant Julian Assange citizenship is a decision between Julian Assange and the country of Ecuador. And we don't discuss whether we are considering bringing Julian Assange to the United States for trial. QUESTION: So that means the Administration has no feelings, no thoughts on -- on the Ecuadorian decision? GOLDSTEIN: Well, we have feelings and thoughts on most issues. QUESTION: Right, so what are they on this? This is a big issue. GOLDSTEIN: On this specific ... QUESTION: And maybe not feelings, but (inaudible). (CROSSTALK) GOLDSTEIN: Right, and on this specific issue, we don't discuss what our actions will or will not be. QUESTION: I'm not asking you about your actions. GOLDSTEIN: I appreciate that. QUESTION: I want to know whether you think it's a good thing or a bad thing that the Ecuadorians ... GOLDSTEIN: That's just not something that we would discuss at the present time. This decision just occurred within the past two hours, I believe. QUESTION: Another question regarding Pakistan policy. What will be the next step of the decision of the United States toward Pakistan, if Pakistan still keep as old policy towards Afghanistan and United States? Any update? GOLDSTEIN: As it relates to the decision that we made? QUESTION: Yes. GOLDSTEIN: We would hope that Pakistan would come to the table. And that they would turn over those terrorists that we have asked be turned over. We've indicated very clearly that we are -- that we believe that can happen. We've only suspended the aid. We've not reallocated the money. So now it is the job of Pakistan to take seriously their commitment to us and most importantly to the people of Pakistan, who would most be hurt by this by another terrorist -- any terrorist activity and come forward. So our position hasn't changed, they have not yet come forward, to answer your follow up question. Yes sir? QUESTION: Can you tell us now precisely what is the amount of foreign military financing that the U.S. State Department will suspend pursuant to the President's decision? You had previously said I think -- or an NIC spokesman said it was about a billion dollars. But I bet -- it's a week later and I wonder if you now have the actual number. GOLDSTEIN: I'll get back to you with the number. You're correct though, that that is the number we use, something close to a billion dollars. It's a -- a series of -- of dollars in different areas that -- that would have to be put together. But again you know, our hope -- and we haven't reallocated the money. Our hope is that Pakistan will do the right thing for the people of Pakistan. Because they should want to root out terrorists in their country as much as we want to root out terrorists in their country. QUESTION: On Pakistan ... GOLDSTEIN: Yes, sir. QUESTION: I had brought this up earlier, I don't know if there's an answer to it or not. But do you have anything on any kind of recent interaction with the government of Pakistan on the situation -- in the case of Dr. Afridi? GOLDSTEIN: I don't, but I will check on that and I'll get back to you later today. Yes, ma'am? QUESTION: Thanks so much. On Pakistan, we understand that officials have said they will stop sharing intelligence and already have stopped sharing intelligence, from sources on the ground on the Afghan border with the U.S. What's your reaction to that? Have they informed you of that? Are you making efforts to see if that's correct and ... GOLDSTEIN: No, they've not informed us of that. And I checked on that at -- at a quarter to two Eastern Time, and as of that point, that had not occurred. QUESTION: ... do you anticipate the -- unilaterally cut off the supply ... GOLDSTEIN: Because, as Matt noted, I have feeling -- I am hopeful that Pakistan will do the right thing and turn over the terrorists and -- and honor their commitment. Yes, sir? QUESTION: You've been very vocal from the podium about asking the Iranians to release people who have been arrested in protests and also to give them free access to the web. Tunisia has arrested 600 protesters in recent days. Do -- do the Tunisians have a right to protest in the same way? Also, Saudi Arabia has held blogger Raif Badawi now for three years and has lashed him. He wanted access to the Internet. GOLDSTEIN: Well the -- the -- the protests that are currently going on in Tunisia relate to longstanding economic issues. We believe that people in all countries should have the right to dissent and we encourage nations to allow that to occur. And that would include Tunisia. As it -- we ... QUESTION: Raif Badawi in Saudi Arabia? GOLDSTEIN: We -- we don't ... QUESTION: Just two days ago was the third anniversary of him being jailed for 10 years. GOLDSTEIN: Yes. Any person who is in the media, who is trying to do their job and -- and has been punished for participating in trying to provide information to that country through free -- through freedom of the press should be afforded appropriate considerations. And it's not just as it relates to the blogger in Saudi Arabia, but there are journalists imprisoned in many countries, and -- and those countries should try to address these issues as quickly as possible. QUESTION: You stated that U.S. government is supporting Turkey's stable democratic reliable ally, yet we hear these accusations are coming every day. Do you think there's a problem in issue -- in communication channels between these two allies, U.S. and Turkey? GOLDSTEIN: All -- we believe that the government of Turkey could be a strong ally to the United States. And communication with all nations is important. That is -- that is as far as I can go on that. QUESTION: ... they're a NATO ally. GOLDSTEIN: Yes, yes, they're a NATO ally, absolutely. QUESTION: Is that a strong ally? GOLDSTEIN: Yes, they're a strong ally but there's always work to be done with each -- as we work with each nation and they tell us their concerns and we tell nations our concerns. And we work together to try to reach agreement. And when we have concerns we address those, and if they have concerns about something that's happening in the United States, they address that with us. That's no different than Turkey or any other nation. QUESTION: Is Turkey attending the Vancouver meeting? GOLDSTEIN: I will get back to you on that. No, I don't believe they are. I don't believe they are. QUESTION: They were attending yesterday. GOLDSTEIN: Right, I'll get back to you on that. QUESTION: If you ever remember watching MASH ... GOLDSTEIN: I did, I did. QUESTION: You'll remember the Turks were there. GOLDSTEIN: Yes. I did watch MASH, I was about three years old, but I did watch it. (LAUGHTER) GOLDSTEIN: Wait a minute, I don't know if I like all that laughter there. I said the only part about getting older is that it used to be when I was 50, people would go you look like you're 35. But now that I'm in my 60's, people go you look like you're 58. (LAUGHTER) GOLDSTEIN: I said I don't know if I consider that such a compliment. Does anyone new have a question before I go back to the others? Let me just do two more questions and I'll come back to you, go ahead. QUESTION: I wanted to ask you a very quick question that Chad (ph) raised the other day on the settlements. He asked you a question on the building of -- of the plans, for building 1,329 illegal settlements, and you said that you would get back to him. Have you provided him any answer yet? GOLDSTEIN: President Trump has made clear, while the existence of settlements are not in themselves an impediment to peace, further unrestrained settlement activity does not help advance peace. The Israeli government has made clear that going forward its intent to adopt a policy regarding settlement activity that takes the President's concern into consideration. And the United States welcomes this. And we're hard at work on trying to develop a comprehensive peace plan that would benefit both Israelis and Palestinians. And it will be unveiled when the time is right. QUESTION: That's all well and good, but that -- but that -- that statement -- that statement is almost a year old now. GOLDSTEIN: Well that's -- that's the position that we have. QUESTION: And in that -- in the -- in the time between that -- when that statement was first made and now, there have been thousands and thousands of new settlement construction projects announced. So I -- the question is, are you satisfied with the Israeli response to the President's expression of concern about -- about this? Or are you not satisfied? GOLDSTEIN: We believe that is in the government's interest to adopt a policy regarding settlement activity and we're working towards that. QUESTION: And do you? -- GOLDSTEIN: I -- I -- I can't go any further ... QUESTION: That -- that that's fine. But they ... GOLDSTEIN: ... I can't go any -- QUESTION: ... They seem to have adopted a policy of building more and more. GOLDSTEIN: I -- I -- I've stated what our position is. QUESTION: To follow-up to Saied's (ph) previous question ... GOLDSTEIN: Our position will not change in the next -- in the past 30 seconds, but I'm happy to answer (ph). QUESTION: ... On -- on -- on the UNRWA funding. Is it your understanding that if UNRWA no longer has any money that the responsibility for the refugees devolves on occupying power? GOLDSTEIN: I think you're making an assumption of what will occur and that's not an assumption that I would make. We have not halted funding to UNRWA. The decision is under review, there's still deliberations taking place. Let's not make -- let's wait until that -- that deliberation occurs. QUESTION: But it is the responsibility of an occupying power to look after refugees? GOLDSTEIN: It's the responsibility -- it's responsible (ph) for the Secretary of State to make a decision to make a decision on that. And he will, after he's had appropriate deliberation. QUESTION: On China. GOLDSTEIN: One more question. Right in the back, right there. QUESTION: When's that to be expected? GOLDSTEIN: Well we don't have a timetable to be expected ... QUESTION: The Secretary. GOLDSTEIN: ... But -- but when -- when it does ... QUESTION: So it is wide open? GOLDSTEIN: ... Well when -- we don't have a timetable to be -- as to when it's to be expected. But when it does occur, I will let you know. I'm -- will be up here for as long as you need me and I appreciate you taking the time today. I hope all of you have a nice Thursday and a good weekend. Thank you so much. END

Selected originals (offcuts, selected scenes, out-takes, rushes) for story "Panmunjom, Korea" 53/30. <br/> <br/>Material for Newsreel Story - extra shots. <br/> <br/>Korea. <br/> <br/>American and North Korean officers supervise the hand over of Prisoner of War who are returning to their respective sides. Interviews (mute) with returned UN (United Nations) prisoners. Night shots of train carrying POWs. Injured North Koreans helped off train. More interviews with UN troops. Various officers arrive. Helicopters carry injured soldiers. Various shots of ex-Prisoners. CU Freedom Gate sign. More shots of Prisoners. Various officers including General Mark Clark (UN Commander). Clark gives (mute) interview. Press and cameramen take note. Officers visit injured men. General in Freedom Village and outside US Army Surgical Hospital tent (MASH).

"CORPORAL KLINGER" OF THE HIT 70'S TV SHOW "MASH" WAS IN THE TWIN CITIES TODAY TO SIGN HIS NEW BOOK.ACTOR JAMIE FAR WAS IN MINNESOTA TONIGH.. AND SOME SAY HE WAS THE BEST-DRESSED CHARACTER ON THE TELEVISION SHOW "MASH"HE HAS A NEW CAREER.. AN AUTHOR. "MAX KLINGER" OFTEN WORE MORE CLOTHES IN HOPES OF BEING SENT HOME FROM THE WAR IN KOREA.. BUT NOW FARR IS A WRITER.. "JUST FARR FUN" IS THE TITLE OF HIS BOOK AND IT LOOKS BACK AT HIS FORTY YEARS IN SHOW BUSINESS.

U.S. Army MASH (Mobile Army Surgical Hospital) at K-51 Inje Airfield in South Korea during the Korean War. Interiors of a surgical tent shows U.S. Marine Corps 1st Medical Battalion surgeons putting a mask over a wounded soldier's face to administer anesthesia, and work during a surgical operation. The doctors pass clamps and scissors during the surgery operation. Location: Inje Korea. Date: December 1951.

“Staff Film Reports of the Armed Forces No. 131” is a restricted, black-and-white, 16mm film from 1951 that was originally shown to brief U.S. Army staff on the ongoing Korean War. The film acts as a visual report on the battles, gains, and losses occurring at the frontlines following the Second Communist Invasion of South Korea in late 1950. Photographed by a cameraman of the United States Armed Forces, this film is part of a larger series of films created by the U.S. Department of Defense. This film features visuals of United Nations troops defending their positions in snow-covered areas as well as various offensive aircraft at work, including B-26 Marauder bombers and F-80 Shooting Star fighters. The film also sheds light on the important work of the Army Nurse Corps and includes visuals from Mobile Army Surgeons Hospitals / MASH units and from a hospital in the Far East Command. The narrator additionally includes details about the state of the war through the use of illustrations on maps. <p><p>Opening credits, official seal for the Department of Defense (0:10). Map of North and South Korea: highlights 38th parallel, cities of Seoul, Suwon, Wonju (0:35). United Nations troops in western sector near Osan dig vehicles out during heavy snowfall (1:24). Close-up of troops using shovels, brooms, their hands, and pieces of cardboard to clear dashboards and trunks of snow (1:29). One troop wearing fur lined winter cap and cigarette dangling from mouth clearing snow (1:55). Troops gather around snow-covered outdoor canteen with trays and pans so they can be served a meal (2:21). Clips of troops in Osan: stand guard in machine-gun nests and trenches dug into the earth, snow all around (2:55). F-80s and B-26s (fighter bombers) parked in a row are prepared for combat on airfield (3:43). Flight of F-80 Shooting Stars (4:04). View of farmland, mountains, bridges below as seen from plane (4:08). Montage of scenes depicting attack from the air: planes peel off to bomb a bridge (4:23). View from air of UN B-26 bomber aircraft as it moves over mountainous town filled with Korean troops (5:19-6:52). View from air as jet flies through valleys of mountainous North Korean landscape in search of Communist troop hide outs (6:59). F-84 Thunder Jet flies low to the ground in search of enemy hideouts (7:33). Moment napalm fire bomb dropped on Communist vehicles (8:00). Pilot's view from cockpit flying in row of synchronized F-84 Thunder Jets (8:10). Battle updates from January 15th 1951, position of United States 8th Army’s 2nd Division alongside Dutch and French troops as well as position of Korean troops and Chinese 38th and 50th Corps indicated on map of North and South Korea: highlights the 38th parallel, cities of Seoul, Suwon, Wonju, Yeongwol, Danyang, Jecheon (8:19). Female nurse from Army Nurse Corps hands wounded soldiers their medicine in crowded room of patients at 10th Station Hospital (MASH Unit Hospital) set up in mobile tent in Busan (9:12). Army nurses work side by side in medicine and supply storage area (10:19). Close-up of nurse as she prepares IVs (10:30). Another nurse prepares surgical trays (10:49). Nurse brings prepared surgical tray to autoclave machine to sanitize medical instruments (11:14). Army surgeons in surgical gowns and masks place dressings on wounded soldier with injury to leg and knee (11:26). Nurses re-apply bandages to post-op soldiers at Far East Command (12:12). Nurse adjusts pillows for bed ridden soldiers (13:45). Battle updates from January 29th 1951 in cities of Seoul, Suwon, Wonju, Incheon, Pyeongchang (15:08).<p><p>We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."<p><p>This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit http://www.PeriscopeFilm.com

FTG FOR A BILL WEIR CS VO ON HOW PEOPLE ON THE FRONT LINE FEEL ABOUT THE POTENTIAL ARRIVAL OF NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS ON THE BORDER ARIZONA BORDER MATERIAL: TAPE ONE - B roll and MOS Fence B roll: 14:22:13 ws of border fence in Nogales 14:22:37 - pants through fence, discarded clothes 14:23:11 - nice mexico border patrol truck driving 14:23:46 - great high shot Mexican border patrol driving along fence 14:24:56 - nice pan across fence with Mexico on other side. 14:23:35 - great watch tower over fence - portion fence on ground to be build INTV with Lourdes Gallego, Latino women, native of Nogales, born here, lives now b/w Nogales and Tucson 14:36:53 - "I think there is a problem. There should be more stricter rules on illegals crossing the border. I mean it's so easy for me to cross the border and go to Nogales, and it's so hard to go back. I don't see why they make it so easy on them to cross back and forth." 11 seconds 14: 27:23 - "It's very easy for me to cross but to come back no." 4 seconds 14:27:56 "It used to be a nice quiet place to live but ever since illegals it's unsafe, there's a lack of jobs, our children I mean they cannot be outside our house b/c it's unsafe. 8 seconds I really am against illegals just jumping over (kind of trails off here) 18:18 18:36 "We have to work so hard for our families and they get it so easy. Everything so easy." 8 seconds Great setup with Lourdes and her family and kids playing in yard: 14:29:11 ws of backyard activiy Lourdes and son playing very cute kids playing father barbecueing carne asada - pretty cu shot 20:21 cu of kids turning on hose 14:29:54 - pan off house to cu of two boys jumping through sprinkler - very cute NOGALES, AZ STREET SCENES: 14:31:20 - cu of street with signs in spanish in US 14:31:33 - interesting angle down street ws of street with US flag billowing 31:57 ws of buildings on main street 32:00 families crossing street 32:10 - Mexican flag billowing beyond Port of Entry walls 14:33:27 - compressions - densely populated INTERVIEW WITH CARMEN ALVEREZ, resident of Nogales, marine son was killed in Iraq 14:34:35 "I never have problems with them they sometimes come to the back of my house//well I let them pass. They're just people. They come to work here." 12 seconds 14:35:20 "they have lots of border patrol agents. I don't know why they need the national guard or army to come in.***" 8 seconds Fence B Roll 14:36:56 - move from different portion of fence where houses butt up against it on either side 14:37:38 great nats of loud Mexican music blaring from the Mexican Side to US 14:38:08 wide shot of fence with Mexico behind it 14:38:38 - tracking shot along the fence 14:39:04 - pretty tracking shot with sun shining Terry Husemann, resident of Nogales for five years, lives right on border, shot of him sitting in front of his reinforced fencing in front of border fence 14:39:38 - "It's exciting, very exciting. We have a lot of action day night, every day and every night. We have a lot of people coming, a lot of illegals coming through the border, in and out." 14:40:17 - "I don't like people that's coming through illegally. I believe everybody deserves a chance but they should do it legally." 14:41:04 "I believe that the border patrol needs extra help. I don't know if it should be the nat'l guard but it seems like somehow a lot of the illegals are slipping through even though we have a lot of the border patrol in the vicinity." 15 seconds 14:41:30 "If need be yes the nat'l guard should be here I believe they might be a great asset." 14:41:50 "If the national guard is ordered to do something and they do it then yes, but if they let them sit by and you know//there's some officers that let them slip by." "It's a deterrent, it's a razor wire. It's used for prisons, it's a deterrent, but it doesn't stop them all. If you notice on the corner fence all they do is mash it down and walk it right in." (cu's of fencing) 14:42:37 "The excitement we have at least twenty to thirty illegals coming through every five to six hourse." 14:43:04 "They'll fix some of it. They'll come in strong for a while, make it look good, and then they'll basically ease of"11 second 14:43:20 "They'll come in and make it look good. There's now doubt when a new organization comes in they'll come in and make it look good." 14:44:00 - ws fence with am flag and wheel up ramp into house. 44:18 - fencing around house 44:35 - pan up from fence around house to border fence 14:45:04 - set up in wheel chair looking through fence at fence 14:45:34 - cu face looking at fence 14:46:25 - nat'l guard in New Mexico fixing fence 14:46:48 - nat'l guard in construction truck - fixing fence 14:47:20 - good guard walking around fence and at work 14:47:57 - guard at truck and push into tractor at work - guardsman in truck 14:49:29 - truck moves 49:44 - nat'l guard walking to truck 14:51:11 - good nat'l guard surveying 14:51:40 - good 2 guard talking about construction 14:54:11 - sheriff at mic 14:54:35 - bagpipe at memorial for fallen officers - parade of officers 14:55:10 - soldiers marching 55:39 - nice push to sheriff 55:56 - nice cutaway sheriffs listening 56:07 - saluting 56:26 - police with shade and cowboy hats Silvestre Reyes, former border patrol chief and congressman "All these guys that want to get tough and send troops to the border, they live in West Virginia, Ohio, and Wyoming. Hell, let them put troops in their neighborhood to stop crime and do drug enforcement. Don't put the troops in our backyard." "We don't want another fiasco like we have in Iraq here." RS 118 - Congressman Reyes and El Paso TX b-roll 15:32:14 - US border patrol in El Paso - agent look through binoculars in truck 15:32:43 - Reyes SOTS Congressman Silvestre Reyes 16th District, El Paso Texas: 15:33:54 It's a very frustrating situation. Sometimes I don't get consulted before people make decisions on these issues. 15:34:23 - As long as we hire agents and provide them the support with technology sensors cameras, the kind of equipment that they need to work a very dangerous border, I think that's a good policy. 15:35:25 - This decision will be looked at by the media, the Mexican media, the Latin America media as looking at Mexico and Latin America as enemies, and it will be spun that way. 15:35:45 - I'm afraid that it may ensure the election of an administration that's going to be antagonistic toward the United States and especially towards President Bush and his administration. RE: National Guard 15:37:07 They're trained for combat. They HAVE been in combat in the Middle East and now we're asking them to step in and do a law enforcement work, that is CRAZY POLICY that outta be rejected, I don't know who's advising the president but he ought to fire them and put somebody in there that knows and understands what needs to be done on this border. 15:37:31 He outta reject all the people that are trying to push him both in his own party and in these groups, vigilantes that are trying to paint this border as out of control and one that needs to be defended as though it's the DMZ in Korea. 7:51 That is crazy, it's ludicrous, we outta do better than that. 7:55 15:38:08 We can't be pushed down that path. We're going to be perceived as the enemies of Latin America. 8:34 15:38:50 - pan from highway to Reyes looking over 15:39:29 - nicer pan to reyes and push - again Robert L. Boatright Assistant Chief Patrol Agent, El Paso Sector 15:40:41 - "It takes boots on the ground, it takes infrastructure for our agents to do the jobs, and it takes technology to support them." 15:41:02 "We've used the national guard resources in the past, as I said, to build fences, to monitor our cameras, to install permanent lighting. We have used them in transport roles, for example they have also build vehicle barrier. 15:41:32 We have traditionally used other forces as "force multipliers" and in support. And we'll leave it at that for now. 15:42:13 "The traditional role we have used the military for is a support role." And that is the way we have deployed them in the past. 15:42:38 - cu father showing son Mexico border in Mexico and pulls out 15:43:22 - end fence separate US from Mexico *15:43:35 - men running border 15:44:44 - end of fence again 15:45:11 - caravan following 45:20 - push into "fence" - US Mexican border tracking past border fence 15:46:25 - from fence - pull out area border police have to patrol - in New Mexico towards El Paso 46:56 - fence border 47:40 - border patrol truck 15:48:16 - ws sheriff set up at presser 48:50 - pan off mexico to sheriff 15:49:37 - nice border fence look smore enforced 15:50:10 - cu tower with tv camera, infrared, etc to monitor border 15:50:34 - cu danger sign 50:45 - good fence in texas 15:51:11 - river through fence rio grande 51:37 - river with broken fence 15:51:47 - danger sign with river flow behind 15:52:09 - us barberd wire 15:52:43 - river flowing through 2 fences 15:53:29 - great sun through barbed wire ALT Reyes sot 15:55:41 - "All these guys that want to get tough and send troops to the border, they live in West Virginia, Ohio, and Wyoming. Hell, let them put troops in their neighborhood to stop crime and do drug enforcement. Don't put the troops in our backyard." 15:56:15 - "We don't want another fiasco like we have in Iraq here." RS 171 16:53:58 - weir sup 54:44 - sheriff set up in car - driving 16:55:14 - weir and sheriff Estrada - set up walking along border 16:57:27 - how dangerous is this operation on the border? it can be pretty dangerous.over here 16:58:15 - I would need.going to happen AZ Border Patrol 16:59:36 - aerial arresting 17:00:57 - night scope people in line at border with police on horse 17:01:59 - border patrol on atv 17:03:34 - horse back riding past border patrol (CA) 17:05:00 - police walking illegals across border 5:28 - nice pulling out row people with hands over head and in the air 5:50 - from back 6:00 - man frisked 17:06:57 - men getting into back of truck that says border patrol 7:15 - get into back truck 8:14 - last one in and close door - push in. 17:10:23 - they used to just jump over the fence here and they used to throw pkg of marijuana as well. 17:12:10 - sheriff drive past border.

U.S. Army MASH (Mobile Army Surgical Hospital) at K-51 Inje Airfield in South Korea during the Korean War. Litter jeeps of U.S. Marine Corps 1st Medical Battalion come and stop near hospital tents. A sign reads 'United States Naval Medical Center'. One U.S. soldier buttons up his coat as he talks with another soldier. A sign at a medical center reads 'Medical D Co.' . Ambulances pull up. Litter bearers start to carry a man on a litter to a tent. Location: Inje Korea. Date: December 1951.

FTG FOR A BILL WEIR CS VO ON HOW PEOPLE ON THE FRONT LINE FEEL ABOUT THE POTENTIAL ARRIVAL OF NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS ON THE BORDER ARIZONA BORDER MATERIAL: TAPE ONE - B roll and MOS Fence B roll: 14:22:13 ws of border fence in Nogales 14:22:37 - pants through fence, discarded clothes 14:23:11 - nice mexico border patrol truck driving 14:23:46 - great high shot Mexican border patrol driving along fence 14:24:56 - nice pan across fence with Mexico on other side. 14:23:35 - great watch tower over fence - portion fence on ground to be build INTV with Lourdes Gallego, Latino women, native of Nogales, born here, lives now b/w Nogales and Tucson 14:36:53 - "I think there is a problem. There should be more stricter rules on illegals crossing the border. I mean it's so easy for me to cross the border and go to Nogales, and it's so hard to go back. I don't see why they make it so easy on them to cross back and forth." 11 seconds 14: 27:23 - "It's very easy for me to cross but to come back no." 4 seconds 14:27:56 "It used to be a nice quiet place to live but ever since illegals it's unsafe, there's a lack of jobs, our children I mean they cannot be outside our house b/c it's unsafe. 8 seconds I really am against illegals just jumping over (kind of trails off here) 18:18 18:36 "We have to work so hard for our families and they get it so easy. Everything so easy." 8 seconds Great setup with Lourdes and her family and kids playing in yard: 14:29:11 ws of backyard activiy Lourdes and son playing very cute kids playing father barbecueing carne asada - pretty cu shot 20:21 cu of kids turning on hose 14:29:54 - pan off house to cu of two boys jumping through sprinkler - very cute NOGALES, AZ STREET SCENES: 14:31:20 - cu of street with signs in spanish in US 14:31:33 - interesting angle down street ws of street with US flag billowing 31:57 ws of buildings on main street 32:00 families crossing street 32:10 - Mexican flag billowing beyond Port of Entry walls 14:33:27 - compressions - densely populated INTERVIEW WITH CARMEN ALVEREZ, resident of Nogales, marine son was killed in Iraq 14:34:35 "I never have problems with them they sometimes come to the back of my house//well I let them pass. They're just people. They come to work here." 12 seconds 14:35:20 "they have lots of border patrol agents. I don't know why they need the national guard or army to come in.***" 8 seconds Fence B Roll 14:36:56 - move from different portion of fence where houses butt up against it on either side 14:37:38 great nats of loud Mexican music blaring from the Mexican Side to US 14:38:08 wide shot of fence with Mexico behind it 14:38:38 - tracking shot along the fence 14:39:04 - pretty tracking shot with sun shining Terry Husemann, resident of Nogales for five years, lives right on border, shot of him sitting in front of his reinforced fencing in front of border fence 14:39:38 - "It's exciting, very exciting. We have a lot of action day night, every day and every night. We have a lot of people coming, a lot of illegals coming through the border, in and out." 14:40:17 - "I don't like people that's coming through illegally. I believe everybody deserves a chance but they should do it legally." 14:41:04 "I believe that the border patrol needs extra help. I don't know if it should be the nat'l guard but it seems like somehow a lot of the illegals are slipping through even though we have a lot of the border patrol in the vicinity." 15 seconds 14:41:30 "If need be yes the nat'l guard should be here I believe they might be a great asset." 14:41:50 "If the national guard is ordered to do something and they do it then yes, but if they let them sit by and you know//there's some officers that let them slip by." "It's a deterrent, it's a razor wire. It's used for prisons, it's a deterrent, but it doesn't stop them all. If you notice on the corner fence all they do is mash it down and walk it right in." (cu's of fencing) 14:42:37 "The excitement we have at least twenty to thirty illegals coming through every five to six hourse." 14:43:04 "They'll fix some of it. They'll come in strong for a while, make it look good, and then they'll basically ease of"11 second 14:43:20 "They'll come in and make it look good. There's now doubt when a new organization comes in they'll come in and make it look good." 14:44:00 - ws fence with am flag and wheel up ramp into house. 44:18 - fencing around house 44:35 - pan up from fence around house to border fence 14:45:04 - set up in wheel chair looking through fence at fence 14:45:34 - cu face looking at fence 14:46:25 - nat'l guard in New Mexico fixing fence 14:46:48 - nat'l guard in construction truck - fixing fence 14:47:20 - good guard walking around fence and at work 14:47:57 - guard at truck and push into tractor at work - guardsman in truck 14:49:29 - truck moves 49:44 - nat'l guard walking to truck 14:51:11 - good nat'l guard surveying 14:51:40 - good 2 guard talking about construction 14:54:11 - sheriff at mic 14:54:35 - bagpipe at memorial for fallen officers - parade of officers 14:55:10 - soldiers marching 55:39 - nice push to sheriff 55:56 - nice cutaway sheriffs listening 56:07 - saluting 56:26 - police with shade and cowboy hats Silvestre Reyes, former border patrol chief and congressman "All these guys that want to get tough and send troops to the border, they live in West Virginia, Ohio, and Wyoming. Hell, let them put troops in their neighborhood to stop crime and do drug enforcement. Don't put the troops in our backyard." "We don't want another fiasco like we have in Iraq here." RS 118 - Congressman Reyes and El Paso TX b-roll 15:32:14 - US border patrol in El Paso - agent look through binoculars in truck 15:32:43 - Reyes SOTS Congressman Silvestre Reyes 16th District, El Paso Texas: 15:33:54 It's a very frustrating situation. Sometimes I don't get consulted before people make decisions on these issues. 15:34:23 - As long as we hire agents and provide them the support with technology sensors cameras, the kind of equipment that they need to work a very dangerous border, I think that's a good policy. 15:35:25 - This decision will be looked at by the media, the Mexican media, the Latin America media as looking at Mexico and Latin America as enemies, and it will be spun that way. 15:35:45 - I'm afraid that it may ensure the election of an administration that's going to be antagonistic toward the United States and especially towards President Bush and his administration. RE: National Guard 15:37:07 They're trained for combat. They HAVE been in combat in the Middle East and now we're asking them to step in and do a law enforcement work, that is CRAZY POLICY that outta be rejected, I don't know who's advising the president but he ought to fire them and put somebody in there that knows and understands what needs to be done on this border. 15:37:31 He outta reject all the people that are trying to push him both in his own party and in these groups, vigilantes that are trying to paint this border as out of control and one that needs to be defended as though it's the DMZ in Korea. 7:51 That is crazy, it's ludicrous, we outta do better than that. 7:55 15:38:08 We can't be pushed down that path. We're going to be perceived as the enemies of Latin America. 8:34 15:38:50 - pan from highway to Reyes looking over 15:39:29 - nicer pan to reyes and push - again Robert L. Boatright Assistant Chief Patrol Agent, El Paso Sector 15:40:41 - "It takes boots on the ground, it takes infrastructure for our agents to do the jobs, and it takes technology to support them." 15:41:02 "We've used the national guard resources in the past, as I said, to build fences, to monitor our cameras, to install permanent lighting. We have used them in transport roles, for example they have also build vehicle barrier. 15:41:32 We have traditionally used other forces as "force multipliers" and in support. And we'll leave it at that for now. 15:42:13 "The traditional role we have used the military for is a support role." And that is the way we have deployed them in the past. 15:42:38 - cu father showing son Mexico border in Mexico and pulls out 15:43:22 - end fence separate US from Mexico *15:43:35 - men running border 15:44:44 - end of fence again 15:45:11 - caravan following 45:20 - push into "fence" - US Mexican border tracking past border fence 15:46:25 - from fence - pull out area border police have to patrol - in New Mexico towards El Paso 46:56 - fence border 47:40 - border patrol truck 15:48:16 - ws sheriff set up at presser 48:50 - pan off mexico to sheriff 15:49:37 - nice border fence look smore enforced 15:50:10 - cu tower with tv camera, infrared, etc to monitor border 15:50:34 - cu danger sign 50:45 - good fence in texas 15:51:11 - river through fence rio grande 51:37 - river with broken fence 15:51:47 - danger sign with river flow behind 15:52:09 - us barberd wire 15:52:43 - river flowing through 2 fences 15:53:29 - great sun through barbed wire ALT Reyes sot 15:55:41 - "All these guys that want to get tough and send troops to the border, they live in West Virginia, Ohio, and Wyoming. Hell, let them put troops in their neighborhood to stop crime and do drug enforcement. Don't put the troops in our backyard." 15:56:15 - "We don't want another fiasco like we have in Iraq here." RS 171 16:53:58 - weir sup 54:44 - sheriff set up in car - driving 16:55:14 - weir and sheriff Estrada - set up walking along border 16:57:27 - how dangerous is this operation on the border? it can be pretty dangerous.over here 16:58:15 - I would need.going to happen AZ Border Patrol 16:59:36 - aerial arresting 17:00:57 - night scope people in line at border with police on horse 17:01:59 - border patrol on atv 17:03:34 - horse back riding past border patrol (CA) 17:05:00 - police walking illegals across border 5:28 - nice pulling out row people with hands over head and in the air 5:50 - from back 6:00 - man frisked 17:06:57 - men getting into back of truck that says border patrol 7:15 - get into back truck 8:14 - last one in and close door - push in. 17:10:23 - they used to just jump over the fence here and they used to throw pkg of marijuana as well. 17:12:10 - sheriff drive past border.

U.S. Army MASH (Mobile Army Surgical Hospital) at K-51 Inje Airfield in South Korea during the Korean War. A vehicle approaches an MP (Military Police) sentry-box along a road. An MP talks to a driver and the ambulance is allowed to proceed. View from the ambulance as it proceeds along a road on the mountainside. Korean maintenance workers stand at the side of the road. Another ambulance and vehicles coming in the opposite direction. The ambulance comes to an area studded with tents. A litter jeep and an ambulance come down a road. The jeep pulls ahead and stops. Ambulances pull up behind. U.S. Marine Corps 1st Medical Battalion Major Arbin T. Henderson walks back to an ambulance and talks to its driver. The ambulance goes past the jeep and pulls into a muddy and flooded hospital yard. Location: Inje Korea. Date: December 1951.

FTG FOR A BILL WEIR CS VO ON HOW PEOPLE ON THE FRONT LINE FEEL ABOUT THE POTENTIAL ARRIVAL OF NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS ON THE BORDER ARIZONA BORDER MATERIAL: TAPE ONE - B roll and MOS Fence B roll: 14:22:13 ws of border fence in Nogales 14:22:37 - pants through fence, discarded clothes 14:23:11 - nice mexico border patrol truck driving 14:23:46 - great high shot Mexican border patrol driving along fence 14:24:56 - nice pan across fence with Mexico on other side. 14:23:35 - great watch tower over fence - portion fence on ground to be build INTV with Lourdes Gallego, Latino women, native of Nogales, born here, lives now b/w Nogales and Tucson 14:36:53 - "I think there is a problem. There should be more stricter rules on illegals crossing the border. I mean it's so easy for me to cross the border and go to Nogales, and it's so hard to go back. I don't see why they make it so easy on them to cross back and forth." 11 seconds 14: 27:23 - "It's very easy for me to cross but to come back no." 4 seconds 14:27:56 "It used to be a nice quiet place to live but ever since illegals it's unsafe, there's a lack of jobs, our children I mean they cannot be outside our house b/c it's unsafe. 8 seconds I really am against illegals just jumping over (kind of trails off here) 18:18 18:36 "We have to work so hard for our families and they get it so easy. Everything so easy." 8 seconds Great setup with Lourdes and her family and kids playing in yard: 14:29:11 ws of backyard activiy Lourdes and son playing very cute kids playing father barbecueing carne asada - pretty cu shot 20:21 cu of kids turning on hose 14:29:54 - pan off house to cu of two boys jumping through sprinkler - very cute NOGALES, AZ STREET SCENES: 14:31:20 - cu of street with signs in spanish in US 14:31:33 - interesting angle down street ws of street with US flag billowing 31:57 ws of buildings on main street 32:00 families crossing street 32:10 - Mexican flag billowing beyond Port of Entry walls 14:33:27 - compressions - densely populated INTERVIEW WITH CARMEN ALVEREZ, resident of Nogales, marine son was killed in Iraq 14:34:35 "I never have problems with them they sometimes come to the back of my house//well I let them pass. They're just people. They come to work here." 12 seconds 14:35:20 "they have lots of border patrol agents. I don't know why they need the national guard or army to come in.***" 8 seconds Fence B Roll 14:36:56 - move from different portion of fence where houses butt up against it on either side 14:37:38 great nats of loud Mexican music blaring from the Mexican Side to US 14:38:08 wide shot of fence with Mexico behind it 14:38:38 - tracking shot along the fence 14:39:04 - pretty tracking shot with sun shining Terry Husemann, resident of Nogales for five years, lives right on border, shot of him sitting in front of his reinforced fencing in front of border fence 14:39:38 - "It's exciting, very exciting. We have a lot of action day night, every day and every night. We have a lot of people coming, a lot of illegals coming through the border, in and out." 14:40:17 - "I don't like people that's coming through illegally. I believe everybody deserves a chance but they should do it legally." 14:41:04 "I believe that the border patrol needs extra help. I don't know if it should be the nat'l guard but it seems like somehow a lot of the illegals are slipping through even though we have a lot of the border patrol in the vicinity." 15 seconds 14:41:30 "If need be yes the nat'l guard should be here I believe they might be a great asset." 14:41:50 "If the national guard is ordered to do something and they do it then yes, but if they let them sit by and you know//there's some officers that let them slip by." "It's a deterrent, it's a razor wire. It's used for prisons, it's a deterrent, but it doesn't stop them all. If you notice on the corner fence all they do is mash it down and walk it right in." (cu's of fencing) 14:42:37 "The excitement we have at least twenty to thirty illegals coming through every five to six hourse." 14:43:04 "They'll fix some of it. They'll come in strong for a while, make it look good, and then they'll basically ease of"11 second 14:43:20 "They'll come in and make it look good. There's now doubt when a new organization comes in they'll come in and make it look good." 14:44:00 - ws fence with am flag and wheel up ramp into house. 44:18 - fencing around house 44:35 - pan up from fence around house to border fence 14:45:04 - set up in wheel chair looking through fence at fence 14:45:34 - cu face looking at fence 14:46:25 - nat'l guard in New Mexico fixing fence 14:46:48 - nat'l guard in construction truck - fixing fence 14:47:20 - good guard walking around fence and at work 14:47:57 - guard at truck and push into tractor at work - guardsman in truck 14:49:29 - truck moves 49:44 - nat'l guard walking to truck 14:51:11 - good nat'l guard surveying 14:51:40 - good 2 guard talking about construction 14:54:11 - sheriff at mic 14:54:35 - bagpipe at memorial for fallen officers - parade of officers 14:55:10 - soldiers marching 55:39 - nice push to sheriff 55:56 - nice cutaway sheriffs listening 56:07 - saluting 56:26 - police with shade and cowboy hats Silvestre Reyes, former border patrol chief and congressman "All these guys that want to get tough and send troops to the border, they live in West Virginia, Ohio, and Wyoming. Hell, let them put troops in their neighborhood to stop crime and do drug enforcement. Don't put the troops in our backyard." "We don't want another fiasco like we have in Iraq here." RS 118 - Congressman Reyes and El Paso TX b-roll 15:32:14 - US border patrol in El Paso - agent look through binoculars in truck 15:32:43 - Reyes SOTS Congressman Silvestre Reyes 16th District, El Paso Texas: 15:33:54 It's a very frustrating situation. Sometimes I don't get consulted before people make decisions on these issues. 15:34:23 - As long as we hire agents and provide them the support with technology sensors cameras, the kind of equipment that they need to work a very dangerous border, I think that's a good policy. 15:35:25 - This decision will be looked at by the media, the Mexican media, the Latin America media as looking at Mexico and Latin America as enemies, and it will be spun that way. 15:35:45 - I'm afraid that it may ensure the election of an administration that's going to be antagonistic toward the United States and especially towards President Bush and his administration. RE: National Guard 15:37:07 They're trained for combat. They HAVE been in combat in the Middle East and now we're asking them to step in and do a law enforcement work, that is CRAZY POLICY that outta be rejected, I don't know who's advising the president but he ought to fire them and put somebody in there that knows and understands what needs to be done on this border. 15:37:31 He outta reject all the people that are trying to push him both in his own party and in these groups, vigilantes that are trying to paint this border as out of control and one that needs to be defended as though it's the DMZ in Korea. 7:51 That is crazy, it's ludicrous, we outta do better than that. 7:55 15:38:08 We can't be pushed down that path. We're going to be perceived as the enemies of Latin America. 8:34 15:38:50 - pan from highway to Reyes looking over 15:39:29 - nicer pan to reyes and push - again Robert L. Boatright Assistant Chief Patrol Agent, El Paso Sector 15:40:41 - "It takes boots on the ground, it takes infrastructure for our agents to do the jobs, and it takes technology to support them." 15:41:02 "We've used the national guard resources in the past, as I said, to build fences, to monitor our cameras, to install permanent lighting. We have used them in transport roles, for example they have also build vehicle barrier. 15:41:32 We have traditionally used other forces as "force multipliers" and in support. And we'll leave it at that for now. 15:42:13 "The traditional role we have used the military for is a support role." And that is the way we have deployed them in the past. 15:42:38 - cu father showing son Mexico border in Mexico and pulls out 15:43:22 - end fence separate US from Mexico *15:43:35 - men running border 15:44:44 - end of fence again 15:45:11 - caravan following 45:20 - push into "fence" - US Mexican border tracking past border fence 15:46:25 - from fence - pull out area border police have to patrol - in New Mexico towards El Paso 46:56 - fence border 47:40 - border patrol truck 15:48:16 - ws sheriff set up at presser 48:50 - pan off mexico to sheriff 15:49:37 - nice border fence look smore enforced 15:50:10 - cu tower with tv camera, infrared, etc to monitor border 15:50:34 - cu danger sign 50:45 - good fence in texas 15:51:11 - river through fence rio grande 51:37 - river with broken fence 15:51:47 - danger sign with river flow behind 15:52:09 - us barberd wire 15:52:43 - river flowing through 2 fences 15:53:29 - great sun through barbed wire ALT Reyes sot 15:55:41 - "All these guys that want to get tough and send troops to the border, they live in West Virginia, Ohio, and Wyoming. Hell, let them put troops in their neighborhood to stop crime and do drug enforcement. Don't put the troops in our backyard." 15:56:15 - "We don't want another fiasco like we have in Iraq here." RS 171 16:53:58 - weir sup 54:44 - sheriff set up in car - driving 16:55:14 - weir and sheriff Estrada - set up walking along border 16:57:27 - how dangerous is this operation on the border? it can be pretty dangerous.over here 16:58:15 - I would need.going to happen AZ Border Patrol 16:59:36 - aerial arresting 17:00:57 - night scope people in line at border with police on horse 17:01:59 - border patrol on atv 17:03:34 - horse back riding past border patrol (CA) 17:05:00 - police walking illegals across border 5:28 - nice pulling out row people with hands over head and in the air 5:50 - from back 6:00 - man frisked 17:06:57 - men getting into back of truck that says border patrol 7:15 - get into back truck 8:14 - last one in and close door - push in. 17:10:23 - they used to just jump over the fence here and they used to throw pkg of marijuana as well. 17:12:10 - sheriff drive past border.

U.S. soldiers eat hot food for dinner and prepare for the night in Korea during the Korean War. Soldiers approach a tent on a hill. Sign reads 'Kitchen'. Prepared food is packed into Marmite cans to keep it hot. South Koreans carry these cans to the front lines. Men with the cans on their backs, climb up barb wire bordered pathways. They reach the front line and help unpack the food. Soldiers heat the food and serve it out in plates. Mashed potato, fruit salad in plates. Soldiers fill mugs of coffee and juice. They sit and eat at dinner time. Hills with enemy positions. Soldiers sit nd wait for the night. A tank returns from no man's land at dusk. Soldiers prepare for the night. They raise roadblocks and barricades to seal off lines. Soldiers in position with their guns and artillery. A Turkish soldier patrols with his bayonet. Other UN soldiers including South Koreans ready with their rifles in trenches. Soldier smokes a cigarette. Soldiers run uphill and fire at night. Machine gun fire. Captain Carl Zimmerman talks about U.S. soldiers in various outposts the world over. He talks about the next episode of 'The Big Picture', a weekly U.S. Army television report. Location: Korea. Date: 1951.