WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING / HO
00:00:00:00 Q: Democrats/Farm Bill - What makes you think that they're punting until next year?
/nWX/NUSSLE/2008 PREDICTION TRT: 18 OC: MEAN PRESIDENT OBAMA. 
/n12:56:57 No appropriations bills are making it through the process. It appears through all of their announcements that they have made - many of the announcements that they have made - that they believe that they might have a better deal with the next president. I assume they mean President Obama 12:57:15
/n
/n
/nQ: I thought I heard you mention the words 'President Obama'. Does this mean the Bush administration is contending that there's no chance for a 'President Hillary'?
/nWX/NUSSLE/RETRACT TRT: 14 OC: THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY.
/n13:01:47 As soon as that word came out of my mouth, I thought, you know, I should've made sure I attributed that to Senator Reid. I believe Senator Reid was suggesting that. I have NO prediction on the democratic primary. 13:02:01
/n
/nQ: (need to expand oil exploration in arctic) Pres Clinton vetoed oil exploration in national arctic refuge. Does President believe this compares to claims of environmentalists that the Alaska pipeline would destroy the caribou?
/nWX/PERINO/OIL AND CARIBOU TRT:29 OC:ALSO THE CARIBOU.
/n13:12:23 Our position on why we need to increase domestic exploration and production here in our own country is well known. It is critical if we are going to send a signal to the rest of the world market that we are serious about become more self sufficient in our own country. Concerns about the caribou, I believe, have been taken into consideration. We have demonstrated that we have the technology to be able to drill in a way that would protect the environment, not only the natural resources there, but also the Caribou. 13:12:52
/n
/nWX/PERINO/CUBA CELL PHONES TRT: 32 OC:AND USE THEM.
/n13:05:19 The president is saying, alright, Raul (Castro), if you say that you're going to allow people to have cell phones, let's actually really let them have them. As Dan was saying this morning, the average monthly income for a Cuban is 12-dollars, and a cell phone is about 120-dollars, plus service, plus activation fee. They're completely out of reach for the majority of people in Cuba. What the President want to say is, let's call you (Raul) out on that. If you are serious about allowing people to have a cell phone, let's make sure that they can actually have them and use them. 13:05:51 (0:00) / 00:00:00:00 ROUGH LOG:
/n12:42:34 today pres will sign bill to help health insurere/employers from discriminating 
/n12:42:50 legislation will ensure health plans/insurers can't deny coverage to ppl based on genetic predispositions
/n12:43:06 leadership of sen kennedy who worked tirelesly for this cause
/n
/nFARM BILL
/n12:43:34 we sent congress our farm bill proposal
/n12:43:41 pres recognized that ppl deserved farm bill
/n12:43:52 congress sent bloated bill - w/ even more earmarks
/n12:43:59 pres vetoes farm bill as he promosied
/n12:44:10 the bill he vetoed increses spending by 20b but fails to reform farm programs
/n12:44:23 americans are frustrated w/ wasteful govt spending and funneling of funds to pet projecst
/n12:44:33 175M is in this bill to address water issues in desert lakes
/n12:44:44 more for land purchase from one single owner
/n12:44:54 ski resort in vermont - trail to nowhere
/n12:45:02 money earmarked for specific watershed // more for salmon fisherman //peanut storage
/n12:45:14 makes loans/grants more costly
/n12:45:19 some american businesses would be forced to pay TAXES EARLY b/c of spending, NO meaningful reform in this proposal
/n12:45:35 bill completely eliminates limit on marketing loan
/n12:45:48 this bill restricts our ability to provide emr=ergency food by blocking/locking in aid dollars for non emergency use
/n12:46:02 we cant use food aid for developing countries
/n12:46:14 we want to be able to purchase it locally
/n12:46:18 congress should extend current farm bill
/n12:46:34 supplemental on floor doay
/n12:46:38 memorial day is time to observe/commemorate sacrafices of men/women
/n12:46:48 as we honr their svc, its disapointing/iresponsible that congress has failed to provide our troops
/n12:47:02 democratic leaders use supplemental bill that shouldv' been focused on our troops in order to advance THEIR agenda
/n12:47:16 gen petraus/crocker, SURGE is WORKING to bring greater security to ppl of iraq
/n12:47:29 defeating enemy in iraq makes it less likely we'll face that enemy @ home
/n12:47:40 congress has had most of troop funding requests since feb 5 of last year 2007
/n12:47:51 inexcusible that they have missed THEIR self imposed deadlines
/n12:47:59 will result in DOD having to have budget shellgames in order to (provide for the troops properly)
/n12:48:17 after 6/15 we will run out of funds
/n12:48:24 american military personnel, we will run out of funds to pay soldiers including those in iraq/afghanistan
/n12:48:41 the president took clear/principle position regarding this funding from outset
/n12:48:59 house/senate include billions more ins pending that president has not requested
/n12:49:33 one size fits all, plan makes no sense
/n12:49:55 dem leaders have rejected bipartisan bill approved by vet affairs comittee
/n12:50:05 they dont want transferability of education benefits, not provided in this bill
/n12:50:13 doesn't provide rewards for military svc
/n12:50:20 huge tax increase when job creation is necessary
/n12:50:27 didn't even fund troops
/n12:50:30 repub's weren't gonig to be pawns in this game
/n12:50:37 dems could only muster 85 votes to support it
/n12:50:42 house/senate supplemental bills tie hands of our military commanders
/n12:50:50 they fail to meet pres principals
/n
/nQ&A why are you surprised @ politics on the hill?
/n12:51:04 that there's been 15 mos of leadtime, not unsual to have politics in washingtin
/n12:51:14 you'd think you could set aside that momentarily in order to do a job they've known was necessary for 15 months
/n12:51:25 many have diff opinions about global war ont error
/n12:51:31 you'd think politics could be set aside to ensure they were paid, that they received safety equipment neeed12:51:51 dOd has to take drastic measures
/n
/nQ&A farm bill - can you do anything but complain?
/n12:52:11 we're certainly donig more than complain, we've submitted propsals - tried to work w/ congress to - fit spending w/in reasonable budget plan
/n12:52:29 we're doing more than complain
/n12:52:34 when that failed pres had to make a decision VETO
/n
/nQ: will be overridden. how do you determine when to veto or not when congress is clear abt what they want?
/n12:53:09 we beileve it was a meaningless proposal
/n12:53:18 wanted to ensure nat'l security was preserved
/n12:53:25 it was a diff. situation, farm bill is significant, will increase spending for next 5 years
/n12:53:38 based on way budget has gone through process
/n12:53:44 at time we're trying to expand trade - increase amnt of product available
/n12:53:54 ensure that those needing food have that avail to them
/n12:53:59 much more significant piece of legislation
/n12:54:04 we've worked 16 mos w/ congress
/n12:54:09 congress has thumbed their nose @ us
/n
/nQ: military spending -what to do from here?
/n12:54:20 OMB does not send out notices, nor does WH
/n12:54:28 accrd to secy gates and defense dept, those notices may begin in next month
/n12:54:39 notificatin will need to go out in june if funding is not available
/n12:54:53 request for programming will have to be sent to hill @ end of next week
/n12:55:16 this is a terrible way to run dept
/n12:55:50 instead of accelaratign approps. process
/n12:55:56 senate leaders and some in house are punting them to next year
/n12:56:06 if need is so urgent, why not get your work done, work on approp bills instead of punting it to middle of next year
/n12:56:18 that what they will be doing by waiting until nxt year
/n12:56:26 this is not abt domestic spending, its abt trying to hold troops hostage
/n12:56:36 recognizing that they know the pres has made principal decision
/n12:56:46 i believe its those reasons why leadership has made decision they've made
/n
/nQ: what makes you think they're punting to nxt year/
/n12:57:01 appears that they hav made - they might have a better deal w/ the next president, i assume, they mean president obama
/n12:57:19 they've decided instead 
/n12:55:20 this is something both congress and DOD have known for quite some time
/n12:57:28 if it is in fact so urgent to have all this domestic spending considered, you'd think, rather than sticking it into the supplemental
/n12:57:41 that they'd accelarate appropriateions process
/n12:57:49 not really even kicked off yet
/n
/nQ: is there a principle involved?
/n12:58:00 we're in 3rd inning
/n
/n12:59:06 congress has already held 2 mtngs w/ state dept
/n
/nQ: corn isn't making difference in price of oil. where do we stand now w/ earthquakes, mem day coming?
/n13:00:15 i'm not sure i'm prepared to answer that
/n
/nQ: 170B for northwest communities for salmon season. does admin have better idea?
/n13:00:41 worthwile concerns, but when you stick that into a farm bil
/n13:00:50 in a way that is bloated more than 5x the orig. proposal
/n13:00:59 what may be, in and of itself a good provision
/n13:01:04 i'm not sure i can comment on each specific one
/n13:01:08 when you throw it all together
/n13:01:12 taxpayers get frustrated, many get frustrated that all these
/nbills come through, too expensive
/n13:01:25 we're seeing outcry from public abt this bill
/n
/nQ: PRESIDENT OBAMA - DOES THAT MEAN BUSH ADMIN CONTENDING NO CHANCE FOR HILLARY
/n13:01:48 as soon as that came out of my mouth, i said i shoudl attribute that to sen reid - i have NO prediction
/n
/nQ; accord to secret svc - investigation over noose incident at beltsville training facility.
/n13:02:45 (perino) secret svc is investigating, not going to get ahead of them. 
/n13:03:01 noose symbol is a symbol pres has talked about
/n13:03:07 among first to say its not a joke, taken seriously
/n13:03:16 not a symbol of prarie justice but of gross injustice
/n13:03:23 only appropriate to allow secret svc to finish investigation
/n
/nQ: secret svc very intelligent ppl, intelligent enough to survey a crowd, for secret svc to say they need to find out if this agent knew meaning - isn't that a contradiction? if these things are allowed, is that fair to obama? rice? can they effectively protect minorities/
/n13:04:08 one, you're trying to get me to comment on an ongoing investigation, NOT APPROPRIATE
/n13:04:28 i'll leave it at that
/n
/nQ: is it fair for obama/rice/
/n13:04:38 this was @ a training facility.
/n13:04:42 i've never heard any complaints about secret svc protecting anyone
/n
/nQ: cuban cell phones - will they work?
/n13:05:14 belive they would work
/n13:05:19 pres is saying, alright, if you say your'e going to allow ppl to have cell phones, lets let them have them
/n13:05:30 avg monthly income for cuban family is $12
/n13:05:37 completely out of reach
/n13:05:42 what pres wants to do is call you out on that
/n13:05:48 lets make sure that ppl
/n13:06:02 not only do you allow device to be sent but cuban americans here in america can pay for svc
/n
/nQ: cuban network - just a case of pres trying to call their bluff
/n13:06:25 i have nothing but what expert says. i'm sure it was
/n
/nQ: preview on ft bragg speech tomorrow? supplemental funding?
/n13:06:48 this is really abt13:07:00update on where we are in iraq
/n13:07:04 welcoming troops back home
/n13:07:08 pres will spend time @ memorial svc w/ families of fallen before returning home
/n13:07:18 i dont recall (anything else to be talked about)
/n
/n
/n13:09:55 israel - needs to have good relationships w/ their neighbors (syria/lebanon) (0:00) /